2015
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.542.5975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic revision of Afrotropical Laccophilus Leach, 1815 (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae)

Abstract: The African species of the genus Laccophilus Leach, 1815, are revised, on the basis of study of adult specimens. In all, 105 species are now recognized. A phenetic character-analysis was undertaken, which resulted in a split of the genus into 17 species groups. Diagnoses and a description of each species are given together with keys for identification of species groups and species. We also provide habitus photos, illustration of male genitalia and distribution maps for all species. New species are described as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Four hydradephagan species were collected by the current authors during ad hoc collections made in 2008 and 2012 (Table 4 ), of which Cybister natalensis (Wehncke, 1876), Hydaticus servillianus Aubé, 1838 and Rhantaticus congestus (Klug, 1833) were all recorded during 2013–2015 (Table 3 ). Laccophilus lateralis Sharp, 1882, reported from St Lucia by Day et al (1954) and Millard and Broekhuysen (1970) is excluded here since Biström et al (2015) demonstrate that this species is almost certainly restricted to Madagascar, mainland African records representing other, similar species. Similarly Aethionectes oberthueri (Régimbart, 1895), reported by the same authors, is excluded from Table 4 as this species is apparently also a Madagascan endemic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Four hydradephagan species were collected by the current authors during ad hoc collections made in 2008 and 2012 (Table 4 ), of which Cybister natalensis (Wehncke, 1876), Hydaticus servillianus Aubé, 1838 and Rhantaticus congestus (Klug, 1833) were all recorded during 2013–2015 (Table 3 ). Laccophilus lateralis Sharp, 1882, reported from St Lucia by Day et al (1954) and Millard and Broekhuysen (1970) is excluded here since Biström et al (2015) demonstrate that this species is almost certainly restricted to Madagascar, mainland African records representing other, similar species. Similarly Aethionectes oberthueri (Régimbart, 1895), reported by the same authors, is excluded from Table 4 as this species is apparently also a Madagascan endemic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Records of aquatic Coleoptera previously collected from Lake St Lucia and the fresh waterbodies in its immediate vicinity were obtained from the (ISAM Iziko South African Mu seum , Cape Town), the (DNMNH Ditsong National Museum of Natural History , Pretoria; formerly the Transvaal Museum ) and the (SANC South African National Collection of Insects , Pretoria). Other data on aquatic beetle species collected historically in the St Lucia area were extracted from the works of Biström and Nilsson (2002) , Biström et al (2015) , Day et al (1954) , Millard and Broekhuysen (1970) and Vrdoljak (2004) . Some specimens were also obtained during opportunistic collections undertaken by the authors during 2008 and 2012.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations