2021
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-03-21-0089-le
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic Revision of the Banana Fusarium Wilt TR4 Pathogen Is Premature

Abstract: Taxonomic revisions for pathogens of crops should be based on robust underpinning evidence. Recently, a substantial revision was proposed for the taxonomy of the causative agent of Fusarium wilt on banana. We re-analysed the data on which this revision was based and discovered that the data do not robustly support the proposals. Several apparent discrepancies and errors in the published phylogenies cast further doubt on the conclusions drawn from them. Though we do not assert that the authors’ conclusions are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident that the inconsistent designation of Foc lineages, when using different techniques, can cause confusion and this should be resolved. However, the authors of this study do not agree with the renaming of Foc lineages to separate Fusarium species [22] without carefully considering the scientific and practical merit thereof and potential confusion created for practitioners and legislators [70,71]. While the subdivision of the FOSC into species is inevitable, the authors of this study believe that this action requires a more pragmatic approach, with consensus and support of peers in the scientific community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It is evident that the inconsistent designation of Foc lineages, when using different techniques, can cause confusion and this should be resolved. However, the authors of this study do not agree with the renaming of Foc lineages to separate Fusarium species [22] without carefully considering the scientific and practical merit thereof and potential confusion created for practitioners and legislators [70,71]. While the subdivision of the FOSC into species is inevitable, the authors of this study believe that this action requires a more pragmatic approach, with consensus and support of peers in the scientific community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…cubense Tropical Race 4 as a distinct species called Fusarium odoratissimum . However, this proposal has been questioned by Torres Bedoya et al ( 2021 ) who, based on the results of their studies, considered that this change was premature and not sufficiently substantiated. Therefore, in the present Pest categorisation, the scientific name Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.…”
Section: Pest Categorisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of this reclassification has been challenged due to the inability of others to replicate the results and the identification of potential errors in the published phylogenies (Torres Bedoya et al, 2021). While there is sufficient evidence that some species within the complex have distinct characteristic phenotypic features that support the proposed idea of new species, these taxonomic revisions have been challenged for not being robustly and strongly supported by publicly available molecular sequence data (Crous et al, 2021;Torres Bedoya et al, 2021). Proposals of changes to pathogen taxonomy, without sufficient validation, justification and strong evidence, can produce adverse consequences.…”
Section: A Ss Ifi C Ati On Sys Tems Of Fo Cmentioning
confidence: 99%