2021
DOI: 10.25226/bboc.v141i4.2021.a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic revision of the Red-fronted Tinkerbird Pogoniulus pusillus (Dumont, 1816) based on molecular and phenotypic analyses

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtained continent-wide morphometric data (Fig. 2a) from 668 tinkerbird specimens (P. bilineatus: 329; P. chrysoconus: 138; P. pusillus: 117 and P. subsulphureus: 84) most of which were measured for previous studies (Nwankwo et al 2018;Kirschel et al 2020bKirschel et al , 2021, from ornithology collections (Table S1, see also 10.6084/m9.figshare.20066225). In parallel with our morphometric measurements from museum study skins, we also took biometrics of 669 tinkerbirds of the four species that were ringed between 2004 and 2021 during extensive fieldwork across the African continent (P. bilineatus: 135; P. chrysoconus: 215; P. pusillus: 270 and P. subsulphureus: 49) (Kirschel et al 2009b;Nwankwo et al 2019;Kirschel et al 2020b) (Fig.…”
Section: Morphometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We obtained continent-wide morphometric data (Fig. 2a) from 668 tinkerbird specimens (P. bilineatus: 329; P. chrysoconus: 138; P. pusillus: 117 and P. subsulphureus: 84) most of which were measured for previous studies (Nwankwo et al 2018;Kirschel et al 2020bKirschel et al , 2021, from ornithology collections (Table S1, see also 10.6084/m9.figshare.20066225). In parallel with our morphometric measurements from museum study skins, we also took biometrics of 669 tinkerbirds of the four species that were ringed between 2004 and 2021 during extensive fieldwork across the African continent (P. bilineatus: 135; P. chrysoconus: 215; P. pusillus: 270 and P. subsulphureus: 49) (Kirschel et al 2009b;Nwankwo et al 2019;Kirschel et al 2020b) (Fig.…”
Section: Morphometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We pooled all data from P. chrysoconus and P. pusillus into a single taxon for our statistical analysis, for two reasons. First, the two species hybridise extensively in contact zones where many of our field measurements were obtained (Nwankwo et al 2019;Kirschel et al 2020a), meaning many individuals had mixed ancestry of varying proportions, and could not reliably be assigned to either species, and second, the monophyly of each currently recognised species in this group has recently been brought into question (Kirschel et al 2021), rendering possible analyses at the species level spurious.…”
Section: Morphometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations