2018
DOI: 10.37828/em.2018.18.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic Survey of the Genera Euophrys, Pseudeuophrys and Talavera, With Description of Euochin Gen. N. (Araneae: Salticidae) and With Proposals of a New Research Protocol

Abstract: The paper presents comparison of main diagnostic characters of all recognizable species of genera Euophrys C.L. Koch, 1834, Pseudeuophrys Dahl, 1912 and Talavera Peckham & Peckham, 1909, also delimiting new genus Euochin from China. All that purports to illustrate the current state of classification suggests progress and improvements. Discussed postulates include adding color macrophotograps of live specimens to the routine tools of research, and routine use of precisely documented palps and internal struc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Zabka gen. nov. resembles that of Euochin Prószyński, 2018 in having the indistinguishable male palp, and the big, round, paired atria, but it can be distinguished by the following: (1) the male chelicerae have one retromarginal fissidental tooth with one cusp, or a single tooth, whereas have one fissidental tooth with multiple cusps in the generotype and its congeners of Euochin (see the description of Zha et al 2014 ); (2) the bulb has small, antero-marginal lobe, whereas absent in Euochin ( Zha et al 2014 : figs 5, 6, 8, 9, 16, 17, 19, 20; Metzner 2023 ); (3) the spermathecae are anterior located, whereas posteriorly located in Euochin ( Zha et al 2014 : figs 4, 11, 15, 22; Metzner 2023 ); (4) the copulatory openings are located medially or posteriorly on atria, whereas anteriorly located, or beneath the anterior portions of atrial ridges in Euochin ( Zha et al 2014 : figs 3 10, 14, 21; Metzner 2023 ); (5) the copulatory ducts are much longer, > 3× spermathecal diameter, whereas usually less than the spermathecal diameter in Euochin ( Zha et al 2014 : figs 4, 11, 15, 22; Metzner 2023 ). The genus also somewhat resembles Euophrys C. L. Koch, 1834 in male palpal structure, but it can be easily distinguished by the broad RTA (in retrolateral view), whereas RTA is seta-like in Euophrys (see the description of Prószyński et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Zabka gen. nov. resembles that of Euochin Prószyński, 2018 in having the indistinguishable male palp, and the big, round, paired atria, but it can be distinguished by the following: (1) the male chelicerae have one retromarginal fissidental tooth with one cusp, or a single tooth, whereas have one fissidental tooth with multiple cusps in the generotype and its congeners of Euochin (see the description of Zha et al 2014 ); (2) the bulb has small, antero-marginal lobe, whereas absent in Euochin ( Zha et al 2014 : figs 5, 6, 8, 9, 16, 17, 19, 20; Metzner 2023 ); (3) the spermathecae are anterior located, whereas posteriorly located in Euochin ( Zha et al 2014 : figs 4, 11, 15, 22; Metzner 2023 ); (4) the copulatory openings are located medially or posteriorly on atria, whereas anteriorly located, or beneath the anterior portions of atrial ridges in Euochin ( Zha et al 2014 : figs 3 10, 14, 21; Metzner 2023 ); (5) the copulatory ducts are much longer, > 3× spermathecal diameter, whereas usually less than the spermathecal diameter in Euochin ( Zha et al 2014 : figs 4, 11, 15, 22; Metzner 2023 ). The genus also somewhat resembles Euophrys C. L. Koch, 1834 in male palpal structure, but it can be easily distinguished by the broad RTA (in retrolateral view), whereas RTA is seta-like in Euophrys (see the description of Prószyński et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(3) the spermathecae are anterior located, whereas posteriorly located in Euochin (Zha et al 2014: figs 4, 11, 15, 22;Metzner 2023); (4) the copulatory openings are located medially or posteriorly on atria, whereas anteriorly located, or beneath the anterior portions of atrial ridges in Euochin (Zha et al 2014: figs 3 10, 14, 21;Metzner 2023); (5) the copulatory ducts are much longer, > 3× spermathecal diameter, whereas usually less than the spermathecal diameter in Euochin (Zha et al 2014: figs 4, 11, 15, 22;Metzner 2023). The genus also somewhat resembles Euophrys C. L. Koch, 1834 in male palpal structure, but it can be easily distinguished by the broad RTA (in retrolateral view), whereas RTA is seta-like in Euophrys (see the description of Prószyński et al 2018).…”
Section: Yaginumaella Hagiangmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Comments. The species is placed in this genus based on the flat embolus, the dense, long, white setae on the proximal half of the cymbium and distally on the male palpal tibia (mostly missing in the holotype), and the copulatory ducts are markedly shorter than the spermathecal diameter; these characters are unique to Euochin species (Prószyński et al 2018;Logunov 2020). However, the spherical spermathecae, posterior origin of the copulatory ducts, and the single retromarginal cheliceral tooth differ from those of the type species of Euochin (oval spermathecae, copulatory ducts originate anteromedially, and with retromarginal cheliceral fissident), indicating that further data are required to confirm the placement of this species.…”
Section: Genusmentioning
confidence: 99%