“…
Zabka gen. nov. resembles that of
Euochin Prószyński, 2018 in having the indistinguishable male palp, and the big, round, paired atria, but it can be distinguished by the following: (1) the male chelicerae have one retromarginal fissidental tooth with one cusp, or a single tooth, whereas have one fissidental tooth with multiple cusps in the generotype and its congeners of
Euochin (see the description of
Zha et al 2014 ); (2) the bulb has small, antero-marginal lobe, whereas absent in
Euochin (
Zha et al 2014 : figs 5, 6, 8, 9, 16, 17, 19, 20; Metzner 2023 ); (3) the spermathecae are anterior located, whereas posteriorly located in
Euochin (
Zha et al 2014 : figs 4, 11, 15, 22; Metzner 2023 ); (4) the copulatory openings are located medially or posteriorly on atria, whereas anteriorly located, or beneath the anterior portions of atrial ridges in
Euochin (
Zha et al 2014 : figs 3 10, 14, 21; Metzner 2023 ); (5) the copulatory ducts are much longer, > 3× spermathecal diameter, whereas usually less than the spermathecal diameter in
Euochin (
Zha et al 2014 : figs 4, 11, 15, 22; Metzner 2023 ). The genus also somewhat resembles
Euophrys C. L. Koch, 1834 in male palpal structure, but it can be easily distinguished by the broad
RTA (in retrolateral view), whereas
RTA is seta-like in
Euophrys (see the description of
Prószyński et al 2018 ).…”