2020
DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2020.1865784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomies, Networks, and Lexicons: A Study of Kuhn’s Post-‘Linguistic Turn’ Philosophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many books and articles have been published on his book called "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions," one of the most cited academic books of all time. The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy sees that Kuhn's contribution to the philosophy of science marked a break with several essential positivist doctrines and inaugurated a new style of philosophy of science that brought it closer to the history of science (Politi, 2021).…”
Section: Methods and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many books and articles have been published on his book called "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions," one of the most cited academic books of all time. The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy sees that Kuhn's contribution to the philosophy of science marked a break with several essential positivist doctrines and inaugurated a new style of philosophy of science that brought it closer to the history of science (Politi, 2021).…”
Section: Methods and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other scholars argue that people communicate in order to have the desired identity in the communication situation in which they manifest themselves (Dingemanse, Perlman & Perniss, 2020). Referring to the research and theorisation of communication in the diachronic plane, Politi (2020) in his study identifies seven traditions: The rhetorical tradition, which theorises communication as a practical art of discourse, the semiotic tradition, which views communication as intersubjective mediation through signs, the phenomenological tradition, for which theorising communication is theorising the experience of difference and dialogue, the cybernetic tradition, in which communication is theorized as an information process, the sociopsychological or social psychology tradition that theorises communication as a process of self-expression, interaction, and influence, the sociological or social psychology tradition, which theorises communication as a process of Orujov (2021) argues that culture and communication form a strange pair. Neither can be explained without the other.…”
Section: Literature Review/theoretical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of this study in the perspective of cognitive and linguistic and cultural foundations of the lexicon of the modern Azerbaijani language, it should be noted that cognitive linguistics introduces the question of the relationship between language and thinking. Thus, thought has a non-verbal character, while the language is not a form of thought existence, but a manifestation of the human thinking process, which is an operational process through concepts (Politi, 2020). This problematic issue was first addressed by neurophysiologists, doctors, psychologists, and later by psycholinguists and others.…”
Section: Literature Review/theoretical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%