2014
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2014.2396.2421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomy, Definition, Approaches, Benefits, Reusability Levels, Factors and Adaption of Software Reusability: A Review of the Research Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification process consists of reading title, questions, answers and comments to classify them based on various aspects, including the technology used, programming language, and category of reuse. The reuse categories were extracted from the systematic literature review, performed by Ahmaro et al [2], on papers published from 1977 to 2013 on the different concepts surrounding Software Reusability. In this work, Ahmaro et al [2] identified the following categories: design patterns, component-based development, application frameworks, legacy system wrapping, service-oriented systems, application product lines, commercial off-the-shelf integration, program libraries, program generators, aspect-oriented software development and configurable vertical applications.…”
Section: Manual Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The classification process consists of reading title, questions, answers and comments to classify them based on various aspects, including the technology used, programming language, and category of reuse. The reuse categories were extracted from the systematic literature review, performed by Ahmaro et al [2], on papers published from 1977 to 2013 on the different concepts surrounding Software Reusability. In this work, Ahmaro et al [2] identified the following categories: design patterns, component-based development, application frameworks, legacy system wrapping, service-oriented systems, application product lines, commercial off-the-shelf integration, program libraries, program generators, aspect-oriented software development and configurable vertical applications.…”
Section: Manual Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reuse categories were extracted from the systematic literature review, performed by Ahmaro et al [2], on papers published from 1977 to 2013 on the different concepts surrounding Software Reusability. In this work, Ahmaro et al [2] identified the following categories: design patterns, component-based development, application frameworks, legacy system wrapping, service-oriented systems, application product lines, commercial off-the-shelf integration, program libraries, program generators, aspect-oriented software development and configurable vertical applications. This set of categories was also supported by Younoussi et al [25] whose work consisted of another systematic literature review on All about Software Reusability.…”
Section: Manual Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations