2022
DOI: 10.15388/22-infor497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomy Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Under the Spherical Fuzzy Environment

Abstract: In recent years, the multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problem has received extensive attention and research, and it plays an increasingly important role in our daily life. Fuzzy environment provides a more accurate decision-making environment for decision makers, so the research on MAGDM problem under fuzzy environment sets (SFSs) has become popular. Taxonomy method has become an effective method to solve the problem of MAGDM. It also plays an important role in solving the problem of MAGDM combine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current paper, we put emphasis on the Barron and Barrett (1996)'s notion who stated that various subjective methods for eliciting the exact weights from the DM may suffer on several counts, because the results are highly dependent on the elicitation method and there is no agreement as to which weighting method generates more valid weights. On the other hand, we know that in recent years, the multi-criteria group decision making situations have received extensive attention (Diao et al, 2022). In such situations, reaching a consensus regarding the weights of several criteria is difficult particularly when precise weights are required from the DMs (Sureeyatanapas et al, 2018;Danielson and Ekenberg, 2016;Ahn and Park, 2008a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current paper, we put emphasis on the Barron and Barrett (1996)'s notion who stated that various subjective methods for eliciting the exact weights from the DM may suffer on several counts, because the results are highly dependent on the elicitation method and there is no agreement as to which weighting method generates more valid weights. On the other hand, we know that in recent years, the multi-criteria group decision making situations have received extensive attention (Diao et al, 2022). In such situations, reaching a consensus regarding the weights of several criteria is difficult particularly when precise weights are required from the DMs (Sureeyatanapas et al, 2018;Danielson and Ekenberg, 2016;Ahn and Park, 2008a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%