1965
DOI: 10.26515/rzsi/v63/i1-4/1965/161566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomy of Fishes of the Genus Schizothorax Heckel with the Description of a New Species from Kumaon Himalayas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to David [3], the main distinction between T. mahanadicus and T. mosal is the presence of small head (length of head less than body depth vs. length of head equal to body depth). Further, T. mahanadicus Meanwhile, the head and body ratio measurement of T. mahanadicus matches near T. tor from central Indian rivers, because of that Menon [4] considered Tor population form Mahanadi River (T. mahanadicus) as synonym of T. tor. However, in the present study, it is observed that T. mahanadicus differs from T. tor by many morphometric traits (Table 3): having small eye (15.3-16.9% in HL vs. 17.7-19.3%); short snout length (23.3-26.4% in HL vs. 31.4-39.8%) and presence of 2 scale rows between lateral line and pelvic-fin origin (vs. 2½scales).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to David [3], the main distinction between T. mahanadicus and T. mosal is the presence of small head (length of head less than body depth vs. length of head equal to body depth). Further, T. mahanadicus Meanwhile, the head and body ratio measurement of T. mahanadicus matches near T. tor from central Indian rivers, because of that Menon [4] considered Tor population form Mahanadi River (T. mahanadicus) as synonym of T. tor. However, in the present study, it is observed that T. mahanadicus differs from T. tor by many morphometric traits (Table 3): having small eye (15.3-16.9% in HL vs. 17.7-19.3%); short snout length (23.3-26.4% in HL vs. 31.4-39.8%) and presence of 2 scale rows between lateral line and pelvic-fin origin (vs. 2½scales).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The original description of morphological traits of Tor mahanadicus (= Tor mosal mahanadicus) was said to be very closely related to Tor mosal [3]. Menon [4] has pointed out that the best method to separate between Tor species is based on the head length/ body depth ratio. This was clear evidence in the case of the distinction between T. mahanadicus and T. mosal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tor kulkarni (Menon, 1992) Menon (1992) described T. kulkarnii from the Dharna River which is a tributary of the river Godavari in Maharashtra, but subsequently considered as a synonym of T. khudree (Jayaram, 1999(Jayaram, , 2005(Jayaram, , 2010.…”
Section: Occurrence and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tor malabaricus (Jerdon, 1849) T. malabaricus also known as the Malabar mahseer was first described from the fast-flowing hilly streams of Malabar India (Jerdon, 1849). Some taxonomists also considered it as a synonym of Deccan mahseer, T. khudree (Menon 1992, while some believe it to be a valid sub-species, T. khudree malabaricus (Indra, 1993).…”
Section: Occurrence and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%