“…Difficulty arises in deciding “which” morphological traits equate to species, and a wide range of diagnostic morphological characters (chaetotaxy, mouthpart) has been suggested and has greatly improved the taxonomy in many collembolan groups (e.g., Deharveng, ). Further, complicating these decisions is dimorphism phenomena, referred to as ecomorphosis, cyclomorphosis, epitoky, mobile forms and sexual differentiation, and is often discovered within species (Cassagnau & Lauga‐Reyrel, ; Fjellberg, ; Mari‐Mutt, ; Potapov & Bogomolov, ; Skarżyński, , ; Stevens & D'Haese, ). More commonly, many supposed independent species are difficult to separate owing to their conservative or controversial morphology, for example, problematic taxa in Lepidocyrtinae, Tomoceridae, Pseudachorutinae (Deharveng, ) and some based on colour patterns (Jordana & Baquero, ; Yoshii & Suhardjono, ).…”