2014
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2014.429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taylor bubble rising in a vertical pipe against laminar or turbulent downward flow: symmetric to asymmetric shape transition

Abstract: International audienceThe symmetry of Taylor bubbles moving in a vertical pipe is likely to break when the liquid flows downward at a velocity greater than some critical value. The present experiments performed in the inertial regime for Reynolds numbers in the range 10

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results shown in figure 19 are for the same parameter values used to generate figure 18, which correspond to the large Eo, weak surface tension limit; figure 19(d) also depicts the analogous results for the deformed bubble shape when m = 2. These results illustrate the asymmetry of the nose for Taylor bubble motion in downward flowing liquids for negligible surface tension and are reminiscent of the asymmetric shape observed in experiments (see figure 8 in Fabre & Figueroa-Espinoza (2014), figure 10 in Martin (1976) and figure 3 in Fershtman et al (2017)). In figure 20, on the other hand, the results are associated with Eo = 20 at which surface tension effects are significant.…”
Section: Asymmetric Bubble Shapessupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results shown in figure 19 are for the same parameter values used to generate figure 18, which correspond to the large Eo, weak surface tension limit; figure 19(d) also depicts the analogous results for the deformed bubble shape when m = 2. These results illustrate the asymmetry of the nose for Taylor bubble motion in downward flowing liquids for negligible surface tension and are reminiscent of the asymmetric shape observed in experiments (see figure 8 in Fabre & Figueroa-Espinoza (2014), figure 10 in Martin (1976) and figure 3 in Fershtman et al (2017)). In figure 20, on the other hand, the results are associated with Eo = 20 at which surface tension effects are significant.…”
Section: Asymmetric Bubble Shapessupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Experiments have indeed confirmed the existence of a critical liquid velocity beyond which the bubble shape loses axisymmetry (Griffith & Wallis 1961;Nicklin et al 1962;Martin 1976;Polonsky et al 1999;Fabre & Figueroa-Espinoza 2014;Fershtman et al 2017). An example of asymmetric bubble shapes in downward flowing liquids is shown in figure 1 in which it is seen that the bubble nose becomes distorted, and in an attempt to avoid the fast-moving fluid at the centre of the tube, the bubble moves closer to the tube wall (Nicklin et al 1962), rising faster than it would have done had it remained axisymmetric (Martin 1976;Polonsky et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar result has also been reported by Milan et al and Usui and Sato for pipe diameters of 0.0088 m and 0.024 m, respectively. Fabre et al have also reported a similar observation for counter current flow in 0.024–0.04 m diameter pipe. They showed that the motion of an asymmetric bubble is much more sensitive to surface tension than that of a symmetric bubble.…”
Section: Experimentationsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The slug unit includes a bullet-shaped Taylor bubble and a continuous liquid slug (Araújo et al, 2012). Taylor bubbles move faster than the liquid in vertical tubes with buoyancy effects (Jean & Bernardo, 2014). In this process, a thin film of liquid is formed around Taylor bubbles (Tahir et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%