Excavation, Support and Monitoring 1993
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-042067-7.50017-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TBM Performance Analysis with Reference to Rock Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance analysis of TBM and the development of accurate estimation model have been the main targets for many researchers (Ozdemir 1977;Blindheim 1979;Nelson 1993;Rostami and Ozdemir 1993;Barton 2000;Yagiz 2002). TBM performance is usually characterized by the rate of penetration (ROP), utilization factor (U) and advance rate (AR).…”
Section: Background On Tunnel Boring Machine and Rock Mass Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance analysis of TBM and the development of accurate estimation model have been the main targets for many researchers (Ozdemir 1977;Blindheim 1979;Nelson 1993;Rostami and Ozdemir 1993;Barton 2000;Yagiz 2002). TBM performance is usually characterized by the rate of penetration (ROP), utilization factor (U) and advance rate (AR).…”
Section: Background On Tunnel Boring Machine and Rock Mass Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the time while the cutterhead rotates and is pushed towards the face. The penetration rate of a TBM is typically estimated from some properties of intact rock [18], [19], [20], often the uniaxial intact rock compressive strength σC. However, the influence of discontinuity spacing and conditions on the penetration rates is well known [21], [22].…”
Section: Tbm Penetration Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, encountering ground conditions different from the TBM's working envelope, affect the achieved tunnelling rate [21] and can give rise to claims. Thus, the model considers the geological setting to be the most dominant factor for the TBM performance, as many researchers have also noted [22,8,10], and all possible problems and downtime are a direct effect of the geotechnical conditions. The selection of the parameters used in the model was made having in mind their capability to credibly represent the ground behaviour, hydrogeological environment and site-specific conditions [23].…”
Section: Case Study 2 -Athens Metro Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess the performance of TBMs many researchers have proposed various methodologies [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] in an effort to express the penetration rate using as inputs data relating to the rock mass properties and/or machine characteristics. Beyond mathematical formulae and analytical solutions, artificial intelligence systems and more particularly artificial neural networks (ANNs) have not been introduced in this issue until recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%