2019 International Conference on Networking and Advanced Systems (ICNAS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icnas.2019.8807890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TCP/IP and ICN Networking Technologies for the Internet of Things: A Comparative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent research indicates that ICNs provide direct support for the functions and requirements of IoT applications, especially D2D communications. The main features offered by ICNs, such as naming, forwarding, security, and caching, make them promising networks for IoT [4], [5]. This paper illustrates a theoretical comparison between IP networks and ICNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, recent research indicates that ICNs provide direct support for the functions and requirements of IoT applications, especially D2D communications. The main features offered by ICNs, such as naming, forwarding, security, and caching, make them promising networks for IoT [4], [5]. This paper illustrates a theoretical comparison between IP networks and ICNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Authors in [29], investigate the relationship between the internet of things and both TCP/IP and ICN, as well as a comparison study. The benefits and drawbacks of these architectures are demonstrated to determine which are best suited for IoT.…”
Section: Ndn In the Context Of Iotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol used to advertise device capabilities must consider the implementation in a very constrained environment (low memory, processing and power consumption) [21], [22]. Some authors opt to use User Datagram Protocol (UDP) for the communication between the WiFi sensors [23] to reduce the size of the messages exchanged, but the proposed solution models device functionalities by using code words of the predefined length, and is therefore not easily extensible.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%