2006
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tea drinking and the risk of biliary tract cancers and biliary stones: A population‐based case–control study in Shanghai, China

Abstract: Biliary tract cancers, encompassing tumors of the gallbladder, extrahepatic bile ducts and ampulla of Vater, are rare but highly fatal malignancies. Apart from gallstones, etiologic factors for biliary tract cancer are not clearly defined. Several epidemiologic studies have suggested that consumption of tea, especially green tea, is protective against a variety of cancers, including gastrointestinal malignancies. As part of a large population-based casecontrol study of biliary tract disease in Shanghai, China,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Briefly, cancer cases newly diagnosed with primary biliary tract cancer (ICD-9 156) between 1997 and 2000 were identified through a rapid-reporting system established by the Shanghai Cancer Institute with 42 collaborating hospitals in urban Shanghai. This system captured more than 95% of all biliary tract cancers diagnosed in Shanghai.…”
Section: Study Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Briefly, cancer cases newly diagnosed with primary biliary tract cancer (ICD-9 156) between 1997 and 2000 were identified through a rapid-reporting system established by the Shanghai Cancer Institute with 42 collaborating hospitals in urban Shanghai. This system captured more than 95% of all biliary tract cancers diagnosed in Shanghai.…”
Section: Study Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion of women from studies on tea and gallbladder cancer risk yielded similar results (OR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.35-1.10, P=0.10), with significant heterogeneity (I 2 =81%; P=0.0003) (16). Following exclusion of 3 studies with a small sample size, the pooled results were not affected (OR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.80-1.48, P=0.60) and no significant heterogeneity was observed among the remaining studies (I 2 =0%; P=0.76) (17,19,20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our meta-analysis included a total of 6 studies [4 case-control (17,(19)(20)(21) and 2 cohort studies (16,18)] published between 1987 and 2012. The literature search and selection process is summarized in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations