2010
DOI: 10.1080/09695940903565362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher beliefs about the cognitive diagnostic information of classroom‐ versus large‐scale tests: implications for assessment literacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…(e.g., G. Brown et al, 2010;Kim & Young, 2010;Leighton et al, 2010;Remesal, 2011). This new thread in the literature treats teachers' assessment literacy as an asset-a perspective that fits well with our research intent and provides important grounding for our study.…”
Section: Howley Et Almentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(e.g., G. Brown et al, 2010;Kim & Young, 2010;Leighton et al, 2010;Remesal, 2011). This new thread in the literature treats teachers' assessment literacy as an asset-a perspective that fits well with our research intent and provides important grounding for our study.…”
Section: Howley Et Almentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Arguably, such grounded knowledge represents a perspective that ought to be taken seriously in discussions about what constitutes assessment literacy. Seeking to expand on the very small body of literature that uses this sort of assets perspective 1 to investigate teachers' assessment knowledge and practice (e.g., Goertz, Oláh, & Riggan, 2009;Leighton, Gokiert, Cor, & Heffernan, 2010), the current study addressed the following research questions:…”
Section: Intersecting Domains Of Assessment Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, teachers believe that standard tests have negative effects on curriculum, learning-teaching, student-teacher motivation. [36] indicate that teachers believe that their own tests provide more information than the standardized tests in terms of assessment and evaluation. According to [17] teachers express that standard tests produce "teaching of the test techniques" on teachers.…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen recognises that his approach involves retro-fitting, as the assessments were not designed for diagnostic purposes. We learned from Leighton et al (2010) that teachers did not find largescale tests useful for diagnostic purposes in classrooms, but it is possible that they are helpful for diagnosis on a larger scale, when comparing group performances. Julia C. Phelan, Kilchan Choi, David Niemi, Terry P. Vendlinski, Eva L. Baker, and Joan Herman outline the field-testing of a formative assessment mathematics tool called POWERSOURCE Ó .…”
Section: Editorial Science and Misfitsmentioning
confidence: 96%