1997
DOI: 10.1177/004005999702900309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher Perceptions of Inclusive Settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other research indicated that the higher the level of education, the more positive the perspective of teachers towards the inclusion of students with disabilities (Antonak, Mulick and Kobe et al., 1995). Some studies reported, however, that some teachers have negative perspectives towards inclusion of students with disabilities even though they have higher levels of education (Taylor, Richards and Goldstein et al., 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research indicated that the higher the level of education, the more positive the perspective of teachers towards the inclusion of students with disabilities (Antonak, Mulick and Kobe et al., 1995). Some studies reported, however, that some teachers have negative perspectives towards inclusion of students with disabilities even though they have higher levels of education (Taylor, Richards and Goldstein et al., 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research data also revealed that more positive disposition toward inclusion has been found for teachers with more experience in inclusive settings and with students with disabilities (i.e., Cook et al 2000;Avramidis et al 2000a;McLeskey et al 2001) and with more university training and course work in the area of special education (i.e., Bender et al 1995;Taylor et al 1997) and for female teachers (Avramidis et al 2000b;Leyser and Tappendorf 2001). Findings also suggest that teachers are also less accepting of students with severe disabilities compared to students with mild disabilities (Scruggs and Mastropreri 1996;Stoiber et al 1998), and seem to reject in particular students with emotional and behavioral disorders (Stoiber et al 1998;Heflin and Bullock 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…P revious re s e a rch-based studies have also found that teachers' attitudes differ depending on the severity of the disability (Barnartt & Kabzems, 1992). The results of a survey conducted by Taylor, Richards, Goldstein and Schilit (1997) on undergraduate and graduate students in general and special education found that general educators thought that students with specific learning difficulties are the only group of students that should be integrated in the regular education classroom. They thought that students with other types of disabilities (for example, mental, emotional and behavioural) should be excluded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%