2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11125-009-9088-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher policy: a framework for comparative analysis

Abstract: This article outlines a framework for analysis of teacher focused policy studies within an international and comparative perspective. Using the notion of the professional life cycle of teachers, the article examines examples of key empirical studies that illustrate the impact of policy on addressing such issues as teacher recruitment, education, selection, retention and development. The article concludes that the framework is useful in identifying the strengths and weaknesses in the conceptualization and desig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has begun to advance our understanding of the knowledge considered most important for school mathematics teaching (e.g., Baumert et al 2010;Hill et al 2007;Schmidt et al 2011;Tatto 2008;Tatto et al 2010). For more than a decade, recommendations from relevant societies and expert groups have emphasized that future teachers of school mathematics need to develop a deep understanding of the mathematics they will teach (Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences 2001), and that to be successful "… mathematics teachers need preparation that covers knowledge of mathematics, of how students learn mathematics and of mathematical pedagogy" (National Research Council 2010, p. 123; Education Committee of the EMS 2012).…”
Section: Research In Teacher Education and Teds-m: International Findmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has begun to advance our understanding of the knowledge considered most important for school mathematics teaching (e.g., Baumert et al 2010;Hill et al 2007;Schmidt et al 2011;Tatto 2008;Tatto et al 2010). For more than a decade, recommendations from relevant societies and expert groups have emphasized that future teachers of school mathematics need to develop a deep understanding of the mathematics they will teach (Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences 2001), and that to be successful "… mathematics teachers need preparation that covers knowledge of mathematics, of how students learn mathematics and of mathematical pedagogy" (National Research Council 2010, p. 123; Education Committee of the EMS 2012).…”
Section: Research In Teacher Education and Teds-m: International Findmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study explores social expectations around adequate knowledge for prospective secondary mathematics teachers in different national contexts-South Korea and the United States. By social expectations for teacher knowledge, we mean discursive practices institutionalized around what teachers should be taught to teach according to the collective image or epistemic model of "the ideal teacher" in a given society (Oser, 1994;Tatto, 2008). Analyzing the educational aims and curricula of teacher preparation programs in the two countries, we suggest that mathematics teacher knowledge may be influenced not only by social expectations in particular sociohistorical contexts but also by evolving transnational discourses on education.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the case of ITE, the policy remit is generally concerned with the production of highly qualified teachers and, as indicated later in this study's findings, teachers' longevity in the profession. However, the improvement of education systems through teacher performance and the system's ability to produce workers for an increasingly global market are all also important objectives of ITE system design and policy (OECD, 2005(OECD, , 2012Tatto, 2009). An interpretive approach to policy analysis (which we took in this project) examines the way problems are framed and how that is reflected in policy (Browne, Coffey, Cook, Meiklejohn, & Palermo, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%