2019
DOI: 10.1353/etc.2019.0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher Praise-to-Reprimand Ratios: Behavioral Response of Students at Risk for EBD Compared with Typically Developing Peers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
20
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
20
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Behavior-specific praise also improves student engagement (Marchant & Anderson, 2012;Reinke et al, 2013). Of increasing interest for improving student behavior is teachers' praise-to-reprimand ratios (PRR), a comparison of the number of praise statements delivered to the number of reprimands (Caldarella, Larsen, Williams, Wills, & Wehby, 2019). In an empirical investigation of the critical indicators of effective teaching (Espin & Yell, 1994), the teachers rated as most competent elicited high rates of student academic responding and delivered frequent positive responses (e.g., praise); they also gave infrequent negative responses (e.g., reprimands) in the presence of low rates of student off-task behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavior-specific praise also improves student engagement (Marchant & Anderson, 2012;Reinke et al, 2013). Of increasing interest for improving student behavior is teachers' praise-to-reprimand ratios (PRR), a comparison of the number of praise statements delivered to the number of reprimands (Caldarella, Larsen, Williams, Wills, & Wehby, 2019). In an empirical investigation of the critical indicators of effective teaching (Espin & Yell, 1994), the teachers rated as most competent elicited high rates of student academic responding and delivered frequent positive responses (e.g., praise); they also gave infrequent negative responses (e.g., reprimands) in the presence of low rates of student off-task behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, O'Handley et al (2018) found tactile prompts for teacher BSP to result in increases in BSP and decreases in reprimands. The current study provides additional support for both real‐time and delayed VPF as means for impacting teacher praise and reprimands, and may be effective strategies for increasing teachers' ratio of positive to negative interactions—likely to further promote academic engagement of students (e.g., Caldarella et al, 2019; Cook et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Concerning juvenile delinquents, there were observed problems (e.g., the SDQ), but self-esteem might not be the panacea claimed. Many programs call for extreme praise, such as at the rate of praise to reprimand as high 9:1 (Caldarella et al, 2019), yet many studies suggested praise was either not effective or might be harmful (Brummelman et al, 2017;Lepper et al, 1973;Gneezy et al, 2019;Moore et al, 2019). Other efforts included eliminating grade retention because it was harmful to students (Hughes et al, 2018;Klapproth et al, 2016) and the negative effects of school exclusionary policies in favor of letting students escape meaningful discipline (Anyon et al, 2014;Eyllon et al, 2020) Yet, mantras around grit, self-esteem, growth mindset, and other constructs did not transform students and instill academic and social skills with emotional stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%