1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1984.tb00150.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher Questionnaire Compared With Observational Data on Effects of Sex and Sibling Status on Preschool Behaviour

Abstract: Teacher questionnaires are used to assess children's social behaviour in a variety of contexts. Here questionnaire data are compared with observational data for agreement: (i) over sex and sibling status group differences; and (ii) over individual rank orders on more specific behavioural items. A principal component analysis of the teachers' ratings yielded four components--sociability, aggressiveness, perseverance and calmness. Boys were seen as more sociable and aggressive, girls more persevering. Firstborns… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…SCREENING FOR BEHAVIOUR PROBLEMS IN NURSERIES 9 VALIDITY Direct observations have not often been used to examine the validity of scales which describe overall adjustment, though they have been used to validate measures of specific behaviours such as overactivity (Campbell, Endman & Bernfeld, 1977), helping (Severy & Davies, 1971), prosocial behaviour (Weir & Duveen, 1981) and social competence (Connolly & Doyle, 1981). Close agreement has also been found between teacher's ratings of general social behaviour and detailed observations (Hinde, Easton & Meller, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCREENING FOR BEHAVIOUR PROBLEMS IN NURSERIES 9 VALIDITY Direct observations have not often been used to examine the validity of scales which describe overall adjustment, though they have been used to validate measures of specific behaviours such as overactivity (Campbell, Endman & Bernfeld, 1977), helping (Severy & Davies, 1971), prosocial behaviour (Weir & Duveen, 1981) and social competence (Connolly & Doyle, 1981). Close agreement has also been found between teacher's ratings of general social behaviour and detailed observations (Hinde, Easton & Meller, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To cite some earlier data obtained in one of the preschools used in the current study, Roper & Hinde (1979) found that a factor analysis of observational data yielded a different structure from that of questionnaire data, and argued that this was a consequence of the implicit personality structure of the teachers. In a later paper, Hinde, Easton & Meller (1984) obtained evidence about the nature of some of the biases. For instance, the teachers tended to rate the younger children (42 months) more on their behaviour with peers than on their behaviour with the teachers themselves, but the latter became more important at 50 months.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Οη πξνζπάζεηεο γηα δηάγλσζε θαη αμηνιφγεζε ηεο ςπρηθήο δηαηαξαρήο ζηα παηδηά πξνυπνζέηνπλ ηε ρξήζε πνιιαπιψλ κέζσλ αμηνιφγεζεο (Kolko & Kazdin, 1993) θαη ζπιινγή δεδνκέλσλ ζε δηαθνξεηηθέο ρξνληθέο ζηηγκέο (Bradenburg, Friedman, & Silver, 1990). Tφζν νη γνλείο, φζν θαη νη εθπαηδεπηηθνί ζεσξνχληαη ζεκαληηθνί θνξείο πιεξνθφξεζεο γηα ηελ αμηνιφγεζε ησλ δπλαηνηήησλ θαη ησλ δπζθνιηψλ ζηα παηδηά ζην ζρνιείν (Hinde, Easton, & Meller, 1984). Oη απηναλαθνξέο ησλ παηδηψλ έρνπλ ρξεζηκνπνηεζεί κε θεηδψ, θαζψο έρεη παξαηεξεζεί ρακειή ζπκθσλία κε ηηο θξίζεηο ησλ γνλέσλ ή ησλ εθπαηδεπηηθψλ (Phares, Compas, & Howell, 1989).…”
Section: πλαηζζεκαηηθή νξγαλσζηαθή δέζκεπζε θαη αιιαγήunclassified