This study mostly analyzes the pragmatic viewpoints of speech acts and language functions through Halliday’s (1975) language functions and Searle’s (1976) speech acts were adapted to analyze the functional aspects of the conversations and it was also intended to explore the teachers’ perception toward teaching and learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ textbooks and the teacher’s components of communicative knowledge regarding the functions of language in daily activity. The participants of this paper consisted of thirteen Sunrise 10, 11, 12 grades of Kurdish teachers at high school English in Iraqi Kurdistan. Through semi-structured interview, it was found that the conversations in the mentioned textbooks are insufficient from the pragmatic point of view. Some recommendation for the textbook designers, teachers, material developer were raised to make up the shortcomings of the textbooks. The findings reveal that the conversation texts in Sunrise textbooks are not meeting the systematic standard of pragmatic competence the English language learners and the book designer must be recommended to be aware of those shortcomings of the textbook series if they are required to develop their speaking skills in both student and activity series. The implications of this paper can be helpful in comparing the results of this study with other similar studies to check if there is a universal pattern in performing the speech acts and language functions and the interest to Kimberley Education for Life learners in increasing their knowledge of pragmatics in general and the role of language functions and speech acts investigated in this study.