2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10212-015-0272-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher self-efficacy as a long-term predictor of instructional quality in the classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
3
20

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
68
3
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the outcomes learning, task performance, and job performance were unrelated to the performance-approach goal orientation. More recent studies in the teacher domain found that a performance-approach goal orientation was positively associated with work engagement (Han, Yin, & Wang, 2016;Kunsting, Neuber, & Lipowsky, 2016;Parker, Martin, Colmar, & Liem, 2012;Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2013) but that teachers with higher levels of performance approach goals also perceived more occupational strain (Nitsche et al, 2013) and demonstrate lower-levels of pro-active work behavior (Zhang et al, 2016). Performance avoidance goals were mostly found to be associated with more negative outcomes (Payne et al, 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Goal Orientation In the Work Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the outcomes learning, task performance, and job performance were unrelated to the performance-approach goal orientation. More recent studies in the teacher domain found that a performance-approach goal orientation was positively associated with work engagement (Han, Yin, & Wang, 2016;Kunsting, Neuber, & Lipowsky, 2016;Parker, Martin, Colmar, & Liem, 2012;Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2013) but that teachers with higher levels of performance approach goals also perceived more occupational strain (Nitsche et al, 2013) and demonstrate lower-levels of pro-active work behavior (Zhang et al, 2016). Performance avoidance goals were mostly found to be associated with more negative outcomes (Payne et al, 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Goal Orientation In the Work Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replication of our study in other educational sectors (primary education, secondary education, higher education) is needed to validate the number and content of goal orientation profiles. Moreover, future research should point out to what extent goal orientation profiles predict teacher cognitions and behaviors such as self-efficacy (Runhaar et al, 2010;Schiefele & Schaffner, 2015;Throndsen & Turmo, 2013;Butler, 2007;Cho & Shim, 2013;Deemer, 2004;Inbar-Furst & Gumpel, 2015;Kilday, Lenser, & Miller, 2016;Künsting, Neuber, & Lipowsky, 2016;Kucsera, Roberts, Walls, Walker, & Svinicki, 2011;Hoffmann, Huff, Patterson, & Nietfeld, 2009); proactive behavior (Zhang et al, 2016); instructional practices (Nitsche et al, 2013;Retelsdorf et al, 2010), and engagement (Han et al, 2016;Kunsting et al, 2016;Parker et al, 2012;Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2013).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, certain aspects that comprise school climate (e.g., leadership or quality of relationships among teachers) would not be so evident or relevant from student perspectives because of their role within the school (Bandura, 2001;Koth, Bradshaw, & Leaf, 2008). In this context, teacher perspectives become relevant since they perceive and evaluate what happens at school from their own values, interests and motivations, but also play a decisive role in facilitating a supportive classroom climate for students (Künsting, Neuber, & Lipowsky, 2016). Therefore, it is worth asking what are the aspects of school climate that may condition the work and efficacy of teachers.…”
Section: School Climate: Dimensions and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the studies were conducted on GO focusing on assessing the relationship between GO and the proactive behavior of teachers (Zhang et. al, 2016); level of engagement (Han, Yin, & Wang, 2016); stress (Parker et al, 2012;Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2013); teacher's SE (Künsting et al, 2016;Huang. 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%