2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers’ Attitudes Towards the use of E-assessment – Results From a Survey in Bulgaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings from past studies on online assessment revealed that students' attitudes towards online assessment had been generally positive (Dermo, 2009; Deutsch et al., 2012; Fageeh, 2015; Jawaid et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 2013). While students in these studies embraced online assessment, there were studies that indicated that teachers preferred traditional pen‐and‐paper to online studies (Hamsatu et al., 2016; Tuparova et al., 2015). One of the factors that has been cited as a possible explanation for the difference in perceptions is that teachers may be reticent to adopt online forms of assessment, and as a result, may use these approaches in a minimal or suboptimal way (Amante et al., 2019; Bloom et al., 2018; Fageeh, 2015; Hamsatu et al., 2016; Jamil et al, 2012; Rolim & Isaias, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from past studies on online assessment revealed that students' attitudes towards online assessment had been generally positive (Dermo, 2009; Deutsch et al., 2012; Fageeh, 2015; Jawaid et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 2013). While students in these studies embraced online assessment, there were studies that indicated that teachers preferred traditional pen‐and‐paper to online studies (Hamsatu et al., 2016; Tuparova et al., 2015). One of the factors that has been cited as a possible explanation for the difference in perceptions is that teachers may be reticent to adopt online forms of assessment, and as a result, may use these approaches in a minimal or suboptimal way (Amante et al., 2019; Bloom et al., 2018; Fageeh, 2015; Hamsatu et al., 2016; Jamil et al, 2012; Rolim & Isaias, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%