2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2019.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers’ cognitions of corrective feedback on pronunciation: Their beliefs, perceptions and practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such studies were carried out with teachers in primary schools ( Farrell and Lim, 2005 ), secondary schools ( Ng and Farrell, 2003 ), high schools ( Mitchell, 2005 ), and tertiary settings ( Sun, 2017 ), and they have examined topics ranging from beliefs about, for example, teachers’ roles ( Anstrom, 2003 ), communicative language teaching ( Sugiyama, 2003 ), teaching methods ( Tucker, 2001 ), and students’ needs ( Gilliland, 2015 ). The inconsistency between teacher cognition and practice is also identified in the research in a number of areas ( Richards, 1998 ) in mainstream education ( Fang, 1996 ), literacy education ( Cummins et al, 2004 ), second/foreign language teaching ( Xiang and Borg, 2014 ; Sun, 2017 ), and the teaching of specific skills in English as a foreign language, including grammar ( Graus and Coppen, 2016 ), writing ( Zhang, 2016a , b ), reading ( Vaish, 2012 ), vocabulary ( Gerami and Noordin, 2013 ), corrective feedback on oral communication ( Zhang and Rahimi, 2014 ; Rahimi and Zhang, 2015 ), speaking ( Baleghizadeh and Nasrollahi Shahri, 2014 ), pronunciation ( Buss, 2016 ), and corrective feedback on pronunciation ( Cooper, 2019 ). The degree of inconsistency, from partial congruence to clear divergence, with a low positive relationship or limited correspondence, is also reported in the research.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies were carried out with teachers in primary schools ( Farrell and Lim, 2005 ), secondary schools ( Ng and Farrell, 2003 ), high schools ( Mitchell, 2005 ), and tertiary settings ( Sun, 2017 ), and they have examined topics ranging from beliefs about, for example, teachers’ roles ( Anstrom, 2003 ), communicative language teaching ( Sugiyama, 2003 ), teaching methods ( Tucker, 2001 ), and students’ needs ( Gilliland, 2015 ). The inconsistency between teacher cognition and practice is also identified in the research in a number of areas ( Richards, 1998 ) in mainstream education ( Fang, 1996 ), literacy education ( Cummins et al, 2004 ), second/foreign language teaching ( Xiang and Borg, 2014 ; Sun, 2017 ), and the teaching of specific skills in English as a foreign language, including grammar ( Graus and Coppen, 2016 ), writing ( Zhang, 2016a , b ), reading ( Vaish, 2012 ), vocabulary ( Gerami and Noordin, 2013 ), corrective feedback on oral communication ( Zhang and Rahimi, 2014 ; Rahimi and Zhang, 2015 ), speaking ( Baleghizadeh and Nasrollahi Shahri, 2014 ), pronunciation ( Buss, 2016 ), and corrective feedback on pronunciation ( Cooper, 2019 ). The degree of inconsistency, from partial congruence to clear divergence, with a low positive relationship or limited correspondence, is also reported in the research.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Language teacher cognition (Borg, 2003) in WCF practice refers to the unobservable cognitive dimensions of what teachers know, believe in, and think of when giving feedback to students' written assignments. Teachers' beliefs play an important role in their choices of instructional practice (Couper, 2019) and therefore, guide their thoughts and behaviors in the feedback practice (Borg, 2006). Teachers' schooling experiences as language learner, their professional training, classroom practices as novice teachers, and contextual factors such as exam, time, curriculum, and colleagues' pressures influence their beliefs and behavior (Borg, 2003).…”
Section: Teacher Cognition and Teacher's Wcf Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases of qualitative data gained from the interview, the thematic analysis was employed to analyse them. The findings regarding students' preferences for teachers' CF were compared with the teachers' practices presented in the previous chapter since the common characteristics of teachers' practices gained from various learning environment, EFL learning context (Ha & Murray, 2020;Hassan & Arslan, 2008;Haryanto, 2015;Katayama, 2007), ESL learning context (Couper, 2019;Ustaci, 2014;Calsiyao, 2015) illustrated the reliable sources to investigate the similarities and differences between students' preferences and teachers' practices on CF for pronunciation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%