2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:educ.0000049271.01649.dd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers' concerns regarding the adoption of a new mathematics curriculum: An application of CBAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
72
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…While many individuals play important roles in the successful implementation of educational initiatives, such as new curricula, teachers play a central role to successful implementation (Christou, Eliophotou-Menon, & Philippou, 2004;Fullan, 2007). Previous research into Ontario's FDK has focused mainly on the partnership between the kindergarten teacher and the ECE using traditional methods such as interviews and focus groups (Katz & Dack, 2011;Gananathan, 2011;Goulden, 2012;Marsh, 2011;Tozer, 2012).…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many individuals play important roles in the successful implementation of educational initiatives, such as new curricula, teachers play a central role to successful implementation (Christou, Eliophotou-Menon, & Philippou, 2004;Fullan, 2007). Previous research into Ontario's FDK has focused mainly on the partnership between the kindergarten teacher and the ECE using traditional methods such as interviews and focus groups (Katz & Dack, 2011;Gananathan, 2011;Goulden, 2012;Marsh, 2011;Tozer, 2012).…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, in most CBAM research only part of the model is used: or CBAM is used and an amended model is presented at the end of the study [27], [28]; or CBAM is modified prior to the study [29]- [33]; or CBAM is augmented by another model [34], [26], [19] in order to study different types of educational change. We did not select CBAM for its original quantitative or diagnostic purposes; instead, we developed rubrics for a qualitative analysis of teacher perceptions (SoC), for their experiences with the complex changes they undertook (LoU), and what the integration of laptops looked like when new teaching materials were implemented in their individual classrooms (IC), and, we chose to use the fourth dimension added to CBAM, interviews with teachers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…např. Christou et al, 2004). Pokud se vrátíme ke studiím, které v minulosti ověřovaly validitu CBAM modelu, s ohledem na výsledky konfirmatorní faktorové analýzy se vyslovujeme pro oddělené zkoumání konstruktu postojů (stages of concern).…”
Section: Diskuse a Závěryunclassified