2020
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/mkh4s
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers’ Growth Mindsets and the Differential Treatment of High- and Low-Ability Students

Abstract: We examined the relation between teachers’ beliefs about the nature of intelligence (their growth mindsets) and their treatment of high versus low ability students. Teachers with weaker growth mindsets reported being more likely to use restrictive instructional practices (controlling and performance-oriented) overall than teachers with stronger growth mindsets, and teachers were more likely to use restrictive practices when working with a low-ability student than when working with a high-ability student. By co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Teachers' perceptions about the students in their class also greatly contribute to discrepancies between their stated general beliefs and specific pedagogical decisions within a given class. The interactions between teachers' practices and their beliefs about students' perceived abilities to engage with higher-level mathematics are well studied, with consistent findings that teachers often use more traditional techniques with groups of students they see as less capable (Beswick, 2004;Bosse et al, 2011;Bray, 2011;Browman et al, 2020;Cross, 2009;Pagiling et al, 2021;Park et al, 2016;Sztajn, 2003;A. G. Thompson, 1984).…”
Section: Instructionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Teachers' perceptions about the students in their class also greatly contribute to discrepancies between their stated general beliefs and specific pedagogical decisions within a given class. The interactions between teachers' practices and their beliefs about students' perceived abilities to engage with higher-level mathematics are well studied, with consistent findings that teachers often use more traditional techniques with groups of students they see as less capable (Beswick, 2004;Bosse et al, 2011;Bray, 2011;Browman et al, 2020;Cross, 2009;Pagiling et al, 2021;Park et al, 2016;Sztajn, 2003;A. G. Thompson, 1984).…”
Section: Instructionmentioning
confidence: 90%