Teachers' Implicit Attitudes Toward Students From Different Social Groups: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Teachers' attitudes toward their students have been associated with differential teachers' expectations and, in turn, with students' educational pathways. Theories of social cognition can explain the link between attitudes and behavior. In this regard, the distinction between implicit and explicit attitudes is worth to be considered, whereby implicit attitudes are automatically activated when the attitude object is present and guide automatic behavior. In contrast, explicit attitudes infer deliberation and reflection, hence affecting controlled behavior. As teachers often are required to act immediately in situations that do not allow for thoughtful reflection due to time restraints, teachers' implicit attitudes concerning different student groups with shared characteristics, such as gender or ethnicity, may be especially important when considering teachers' behavior in relation to students' educational pathways. This notion is reflected by an increased interest in adopting implicit methodology in the educational domain. Over the last 10 years, several studies have been conducted in different countries, involving in-and pre-service teachers and investigating their attitudes toward different student groups. Estimates of effects have varied and may be affected by sampling bias. To systematically review and integrate data from different studies, this meta-analysis focuses on teachers' implicit attitudes. Following the systematic search of the database and initial screening, 43 articles were identified from which 22, describing 34 studies, were retained for the meta-analysis after further inspection. First analyses revealed an estimated average effect size of 0.56 for implicit attitudes in favor of non-marginalized groups. As there was a large extent of heterogeneity between studies, several moderator variables were investigated. Results showed that the employed implicit measure and stimulus materials as well as the student target group affected the effect sizes. Low or non-significant relationships were reported between implicit and explicit attitudes. Findings are discussed in terms of theory and future research.

Aspirations Are Not Enough: Barriers to Educational Attainment for Youth Involved with Child Welfare

“…At the same time, however, findings indicate that although young adults had both aspirations and resilience, they reported vulnerabilities in other areas such as financial difficulties and mental health challenges and there was an obvious absence of teachers making a positive impact. Our finding of teachers' lack of influence may be due to implicit attitudes and consistent with teachers reproducing social inequalities (Delay, 2020;Pit-Ten & Glock, 2019). Future research should explore in greater depth what protective factors contribute to resilience among this population and how factors such as type and length of maltreatment impact the ability to develop resilience.…”

“…Teachers may also have a limiting or negative impact on students. A meta-analysis of 34 studies found that teachers hold negative implicit attitudes towards marginalized students (Pit-Ten & Glock, 2019) and attitudes about a social group are expressed daily in exchanges with students. A recent study in Switzerland found teachers' classroom discourse influences the choices of students who have been tracked into vocational education (Delay, 2020).…”

The role of preservice teachers’ implicit attitudes and causal attributions: a deeper look into students’ ethnicity

“…More specifically, inservice teachers' implicit attitudes were more negative than those of preservice teachers, but both groups held negative implicit attitudes. However, one recent review (Denessen et al, 2021) and a meta-analysis (Pit-ten Cate & Glock, 2019) did not find differences between preservice and inservice teachers but generally reported negative implicit attitudes. This does not seem to stem entirely from a strong negative evaluation of ethnic minority students but mainly results from more positive implicit attitudes toward ethnic majority students (Glock & Karbach, 2015).…”

Examining Learning Disabilities in Schools through an Intersectional and Equitable Lens

“…Inclusive education (IE) is the idea that education is a basic human right for all students, following the principles of social justice [15]. The World Declaration on Education for All (EFA) defined general principles of IE as providing universal access to schools for everyone and promote equity, being proactive and predicting barriers in access to education and identifying recourses to eliminate such barriers [16].…”