2019
DOI: 10.30935/cet.646841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers’ Perception and Factors Limiting the use of High-Tech Assistive Technology in Special Education Schools in North-West Nigeria

Abstract: The study investigated teachers' perception and factors limiting the use of high-tech assistive technologies resources in special education schools in NorthWest Nigeria. The study adopted a descriptive survey design using a questionnaire to sought data from 120 respondents who were drawn using a multi-stage sampling technique from special education schools within the region. Three research questions were raised to guide the study. The questionnaire was subjected to expert validation and reliability was establi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…HEIs should ensure that AT are readily available for students living with disabilities and that it matches with the standards for international collaboration. Notably, AT is made up of rehabilitative, assistive and adaptive technologies, as well as associated services, which are explicitly made or modified to serve as practical support for students living with disabilities (Chukwuemeka & Samaila, 2020). Similarly, Beelen and Jones (2015) contend that the availability of assistive technology like iPods, IPads and computers may be referred to as an internationalisation at-home activity that supports the unfolding of international perspectives in the curriculum for students living with disabilities.…”
Section: Technology Inclusion As a Prerequisite For Coilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HEIs should ensure that AT are readily available for students living with disabilities and that it matches with the standards for international collaboration. Notably, AT is made up of rehabilitative, assistive and adaptive technologies, as well as associated services, which are explicitly made or modified to serve as practical support for students living with disabilities (Chukwuemeka & Samaila, 2020). Similarly, Beelen and Jones (2015) contend that the availability of assistive technology like iPods, IPads and computers may be referred to as an internationalisation at-home activity that supports the unfolding of international perspectives in the curriculum for students living with disabilities.…”
Section: Technology Inclusion As a Prerequisite For Coilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technologies used by individuals with special needs are generally referred to as assistive technology (AT) in the literature. AT is an umbrella term that relates to the products, tools, and services used by individuals with special needs (Abu-Alghayth, 2020;Anna, Sharif, Wong & Marriappan, 2014;Chukwuemeka & Samaila, 2020;Coleman, Cramer, Park & Bell, 2015;Dominic, Chukwuemeka & Babatunde, 2020). AT help individuals with special needs overcome the difficulties they may encounter in social life and provide opportunities to use their existing skills and capacities at the highest level (Mordini et al, 2018;Pettersson & Fahlström, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this direction, to see the use cases of technologysupported applications, which is one of the scientifically based applications in the field of special education, how they are used, what the problems are, and whether they lead to efficient and effective results in the literature, the opinions, attitudes, needs and metaphoric perceptions of special education teachers and/or pre-service teachers regarding the use of AT should be obtained. In the literature, various studies are dealing with attitudes of special education teachers and pre-service teachers towards assistive technologies and their use (e.g., Alanazi, 2019;Alhossein & Aldawood, 2017;Aslan, 2018;Murugaiyan & Arulsamy, 2013;Onivehu et al, 2017;Sakallı Demirok, Haksız & Nuri, 2019), their adaptation (e.g., Van Laarhoven & Conderman, 2011), perceptions (e.g., Chukwuemeka & Samaila, 2020;Flanagan, Bouck & Richardson, 2013;Lamond & Cunningham, 2020;Nordström, Nilsson, Gustafson & Svensson, 2018;Pogrund & Smith, 2012), opinions (e.g., Ajuwon, Meeks, Griffin-Shirley & Okungu, 2016;Demirkıran, 2005;Demirok, Gunduz, Yergazina, Maydangalieva & Ryazanova, 2019;Özdamar, 2016;Özgüç Sola & Cavkaytar, 2011;Yıkmış & Tekinarslan, 2005), difficulties in using technology (e.g., Atanga et al, 2020;Wong & Cohen, 2015), and their competencies (e.g., Siu & Morash, 2014;Zhou, Parker, Smith & Griffin-Shirley, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the scientific community encourages teachers to modify their practices towards a quality professional practice by incorporating mobile technology in classrooms. This will provide opportunities to deepen the current knowledge and to theorize its pedagogical advantages in special education (Chukwuemeka & Samaila, 2020;Moreno, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%