2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12564-015-9394-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers’ perceptions of constructivist curriculum change as a predictor of their perceptions of the implementation of constructivist teaching–learning activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of a study conducted by Yıldırım and Kasapoğlu (2015) demonstrated that there is a strong relationship between teachers' perceptions regarding the implementation of learning-teaching activities and their perceptions regarding curriculum change. It is also reported that in-service training processes are among the factors constituting the basis of curriculum-related perceptions (Demir & Şahin, 2009;Yıldırım & Kasapoğlu, 2015). This situation shows the importance of preservice teacher education curriculum for the development of self-efficacy perception regarding curriculum.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of a study conducted by Yıldırım and Kasapoğlu (2015) demonstrated that there is a strong relationship between teachers' perceptions regarding the implementation of learning-teaching activities and their perceptions regarding curriculum change. It is also reported that in-service training processes are among the factors constituting the basis of curriculum-related perceptions (Demir & Şahin, 2009;Yıldırım & Kasapoğlu, 2015). This situation shows the importance of preservice teacher education curriculum for the development of self-efficacy perception regarding curriculum.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this process, goals have influence on other elements of curriculum such as selection and organization of content and the processes of learning-teaching and evaluation (Brandt & Tyler, 2007;Tenbrink, 2011), and the relational process involving these elements is shaped within the framework of factors related to the society, individuals and knowledge (Tyler, 2014). Successful implementation of the planned design by reflecting it to the school and class levels requires teachers ' understanding, skills and It is seen in studies in related literature that perceptions of faculty members, preservice teachers and teachers from different fields and education levels were determined via interviews, questionnaires (Alwan, 2006;Fraser & Bosanquet, 2006;İşler, 2008;Mellegård, & Pettersen, 2016;Park, & Sung, 2013;Yanık, 2008;Yıldırım & Kasapoğlu, 2015;Yurdakul, 2015) and metaphors (Anglin & Dugan, 1982;Aykaç & Çelik, 2014;Gültekin, 2013;Örten & Erginer, 2016;Özdemir, 2012;Tobin & Lamaster, 1995;Wahyudi, 2007). In addition, studies focusing on preservice teacher education were mostly conducted with students from the departments of Elementary School Teaching, Science Teaching, Social Sciences Teaching and Turkish Language Teaching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is much research on pedagogies underpinning ILEs in the form of enduring and seminal progressive educational theory and constructivist approaches to learning (Schreiber & Valle, 2013;Yildirim & Kasapoglu, 2015). Student voice, embedded in the language about student ownership of learning and independent learning, and facilitated by digital and e-platforms is argued outside the ILE space to support student engagement and belonging, with learning and school (Nelson, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the findings we presume that teachers' perceptions of curriculum coherence are transformed and constructed in shared sensemaking within the professional community. These, in turn, further relate to the perceived impact of the reform on school development over time (see Louis et al, 2005;Penuel et al, 2007;Priestley et al, 2014;Sullanmaa et al, 2019b;Yildirim & Kasapoglu, 2015). Hence, school impact, in terms of meaningful and functional school-level development, is likely to be promoted by change management, knowledge sharing and perceived curriculum coherence (see Allen & Penuel, 2015;Fullan, 1996;Newmann et al, 2001;Russell & Bray, 2013).…”
Section: Relationships Between the Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%