2014
DOI: 10.1080/00071005.2014.941786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers’ Views of Curriculum Policy: The Case of Estonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Since regaining independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, Estonia and other former Soviet Eastern European countries have undergone major social, political and economic transformations that have substantially affected education and teachers (Cerych, 1999). Among the consequences of these transformations have been an enormous growth in teacher autonomy as a declared policy aim, but also a rapid increase in teacher responsibility for centrally defined learning outcomes of their students, which has generated a feeling of excessive external control and insecurity among teachers (Erss et al, 2014;Mikser et al, 2016). This insecurity may have caused teachers to consider "moonlighting" as a way of decreasing the risks of being stigmatized or left unemployed.…”
Section: Estonian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since regaining independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, Estonia and other former Soviet Eastern European countries have undergone major social, political and economic transformations that have substantially affected education and teachers (Cerych, 1999). Among the consequences of these transformations have been an enormous growth in teacher autonomy as a declared policy aim, but also a rapid increase in teacher responsibility for centrally defined learning outcomes of their students, which has generated a feeling of excessive external control and insecurity among teachers (Erss et al, 2014;Mikser et al, 2016). This insecurity may have caused teachers to consider "moonlighting" as a way of decreasing the risks of being stigmatized or left unemployed.…”
Section: Estonian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, teachers play a vital role in the education change process, with many arguing unsuccessful reforms are a reflection of teacher’s attitudes (Kennedy, 2005): their fixed habits and sense of security in the familiar, their failure to recognise the need for change, their previous experience with unsuccessful educational reforms, and perceived threats to their expertise, power and social relationships (Zimmerman, 2006). Other studies (Erss et al, 2014) reveal teachers administer reform based on their perceptions of what is considered important. During communist Soviet pedagogy, many Estonian pre-school teachers developed a hidden personalised curriculum among the strict regimes prescribed, including those elements personally considered necessary whilst meeting components of the written curriculum.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because teachers and principals are mediators between the curriculum and students, they were selected to be respondents in the survey assessing the implemented curriculum. Studies show that if these key agents do not approve or accept a reform proposed, the latter will not be implemented to the extent originally planned [Erss et al 2014;Spreen 2004;Livingstone et al:7].…”
Section: Doi: 1017323/1814-9545-2019-3-77-100mentioning
confidence: 99%