Crystallization
is an ancient unit operation that remains vital
for the chemical process industry. Traditional single-effect evaporation
consumes a great deal of energy, and various alternatives to this
method have been proposed. In this work, the total cost of producing
a fixed quantity of different solid chemicals by crystallization from
water is determined for several different technologies: evaporative
crystallization, membrane distillation with porous hydrophobic membranes,
reverse osmosis membrane-assisted crystallization, and eutectic freeze
crystallization (EFC). Among the solute properties, the solubility
has the greatest effect on the cost of the process since it determines
the amount of water that must be removed per unit product produced.
If waste heat is available at a unit price lower than that of low-pressure
steam produced using coal or natural gas, then the assumed price of
waste heat also has a significant effect on the economics. The results
indicate that, if feasible, reverse osmosis has the lowest total annual
cost. On the other hand, for high osmotic pressure cases, EFC has
the lowest cost when cheap heating energy (waste heat) is not available.
On the contrary, a conventional single or multiple effect evaporative
crystallization has the lowest cost among the remaining options when
heating energy is cheap or solubility is high. Moreover, eutectic
temperature plays important role when determining the best technology
when solubility is between 0.2 and 0.6 kg/kg solution.