Teaching and confronting digital extremism: contexts, challenges and opportunities

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to offer practical guidance on teaching about digital extremism – defined here as the intersection of digital disinformation campaigns with political extremism – by highlighting four pedagogical challenges: the danger of unintentionally “redpilling” students; the slippery slope to false equivalency and “bothsidesism” in turbulent partisan waters; the difficulty of separating empirical analyses from prescriptive debates circulating in popular media; and the trouble of getting students to understand digital extremism as a sociotechnical problem rather than as a social-or-technical problem. The conclusion proposes opportunities for educators to integrate practical approaches to confronting digital extremism with digital civics curricula. Design/methodology/approach This paper reviews pedagogical challenges and outlines a curricular program for teaching about digital extremism drawn from the author’s experience designing undergraduate courses and open teaching modules between 2016 and 2021. Findings Educators should shift focus from the substance of digital extremism to its tools – social media platforms’ surveillance and data-gathering methods, advertising technologies and monetized user-generated content, personalized recommendation algorithms and media manipulation strategies that amplify some narratives while suppressing others – and the media and political institutions that benefit most from it. Proposed lessons include: how digital extremists manipulate social media metadata; engagement with data creation and targeting practices; and analysis of information production, circulation and consumption exploring media manipulation tools and their effects. Originality/value This paper’s added values are the insights and practical recommendations for undergraduate educators teaching on a topic of urgent contemporary concern: digital extremism.

Challenges and Opportunities for Main Stream Media and Journalism in a Digital and Social Media Environment: Perspective from Israel

“…In combination, these advancements imply that web customers have accessibility to more and more information from more and more sources, increasing the opportunities the majority of people need to utilize diverse resources and also encounter various perspectives (Rea, 2022). At the same time the environment is significantly dominated by a minimal variety of very large players and accompanied by debt consolidation and also cost-cutting somewhere else in the media landscape.…”

Playing With Your Emotions An Evaluation of Learning about COVID-19 Misinformation Via an Interactive Multimedia Narrative

“…Misinformation, or information that is either intentionally or unintentionally false or misleading, has been a persistent public health problem throughout the COVID-19 pandemic (WHO, 2020). Educators and education researchers have also been concerned with misinformation during this time (e.g., Barzilai & Chinn, 2020;Brodsky et al, 2021;Kendeou, Robinson, & McCrudden, 2019;Rea, 2022), and in response to the rapid spread of COVID-19 misinformation online, many have developed strategies to intervene in the spread of misinformation and improve information literacy. Their tools and approaches are varied and focus on everything from policy and platform-change recommendations (Yaraghi, 2019), to lifelong learning approaches (Jaeger & Green Taylor, 2021), to pre-bunking and debunking efforts (Garcia & Shane, 2021).…”