2017
DOI: 10.1080/20004508.2017.1343606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching and learning physics using technology: Making a case for the affective domain

Abstract: Even though its importance is underscored in many research pursuits, attention to the affective domain in learning is often neglected at the expense of the cognitive development of students studying science, in particular physics. In this paper we propose a framework, the pedagogical technological integrated medium (PTIM) founded on the TPACK model, that builds on the existing premises of pedagogy, content and technology to make space for the affective domain where these three premises intersect with each othe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
29
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the reasons why students often preferred to use these technological programs and applications in learning physics can be explained by the results of the study of Korur, Toker, and Eryılmaz (2016), which stated that it reduced students' cognitive load and positively affected students' physics learning by increasing the processing time of information in short-term memory. However, it is also stated that students who are used to learning with instructions may remain passive and the expected increase in motivation or success may not occur (Ramma et al 2018). Therefore, it would be appropriate for physics teachers to integrate these highly preferred technologies into the relevant subjects in the curriculum in a systematic order, taking into account the periods when students have to learn independently outside of school (such as the current pandemic period).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons why students often preferred to use these technological programs and applications in learning physics can be explained by the results of the study of Korur, Toker, and Eryılmaz (2016), which stated that it reduced students' cognitive load and positively affected students' physics learning by increasing the processing time of information in short-term memory. However, it is also stated that students who are used to learning with instructions may remain passive and the expected increase in motivation or success may not occur (Ramma et al 2018). Therefore, it would be appropriate for physics teachers to integrate these highly preferred technologies into the relevant subjects in the curriculum in a systematic order, taking into account the periods when students have to learn independently outside of school (such as the current pandemic period).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La sociedad del conocimiento ha posicionado a las tecnologías como una de las variables críticas en la enseñanza, y más aún en los momentos de pandemia que estamos viviendo. Las investigaciones evidencian en sus resultados que la tecnología suele emplearse como medio de información, en lugar de una herramienta pedagógica que potencie los niveles cognitivos (Ramma et al, 2018). Las tecnologías de la información y comunicación (TIC) "son consideradas prioritarias, no solo para alcanzar y contribuir a la alfabetización digital, sino también para apoyar el aprendizaje permanente a lo largo de toda la vida" (Herrero, 2014, p. 175).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Researchers have reported that use of innovative online tools combined with appropriate focus on student interactions in a blended physics course increased the students learning capacity and boosted a high-level of self-reported enjoyment (Ramma, Bholoa, Watts, & Nadal, 2018). There are also studies that point to the critical nature of student's online engagement for achieving the course outcomes like critical thinking abilities and practical competence (Trowler & Trowler, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%