2016
DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2016.1253673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching and personal educational knowledge – conceptual considerations for research on knowledge transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, research is just one source amongst many (Nutley et al 2007). To these elements, Wieser (2016) and Cain (2015) added both personal and professional experience in the construction of knowledge.…”
Section: Configuration Of Factors Influencing the Research Uptake In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, research is just one source amongst many (Nutley et al 2007). To these elements, Wieser (2016) and Cain (2015) added both personal and professional experience in the construction of knowledge.…”
Section: Configuration Of Factors Influencing the Research Uptake In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, teacher educators seemed to find the distance between research and the field of evaluation extremely wide and difficult to overcome, and research literature was often considered too irrelevant and remote from the complex cultural and social identity of teacher education as an applied subject and more specifically PE as a bodily, practical subject in the field of evaluation. This issue addresses an ongoing and pervasive critique of the types of research that is conducted and of the ways it is made available to the end users in teacher education (Healey, 2005;Nelson & Campbell, 2017;Wieser, 2016). As suggested earlier, this also challenges the hierarchical logic in Bernsteins model and suggests a broader and more fluid concept of research.…”
Section: It Has To Add Value: Lack Of Relevance Of Research For Teachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is inextricably related to knowledge transformation. Specifically: the knowledge externalization enhances the understanding the environment and compacts the strategic vision of knowledge-based talents [20]; the knowledge internalization allows the knowledge-based talents to have a deeper understanding of the internal mechanisms of things, and strengthen their analytical capabilities and improve more judgmental ability; knowledge integration can enable the knowledge-based talents to place themselves in a more ambitious environment, build high-rise, control the overall situation of things more effectively, coordinate the cooperation relationship between the parties, and lay the foundation for the sublimation of thinking for a higher starting point; knowledge socialization can get the thinking endurance of the knowledge-based talents further practiced and improved, optimize the thinking model, and increase the intensity of thinking. It can be seen that the four elements of knowledge transformation promote the psychological intelligence in an all-round way, especially the knowledge socialization and the knowledge implicitness are more persistent.…”
Section: ) the Promotion Effect Of Knowledge Transformation On Psychmentioning
confidence: 99%