Intensive courses have become a mainstay of higher education. Defined as semester-or quarter-equivalent classes offered in compressed, accelerated, or condensed formats, most colleges and universities now offer intensive classes alongside traditional semester-length classes. Although intensive courses have become quite common, many academic and administrative pundits condemn their use and claim that these formats sacrifice academic rigor and learning for student convenience and higher enrollments. Although they offer little research to support their claims, many colleges and universities continue to schedule classes based on assumptions and tradition rather than solid empirical evidence.Recent research, however, suggests that intensive course formats can be effective alternatives to traditional formats. Scott and Conrad's review (1992) of the intensive course research and studies published since their review (Caskey, 1994;Wlodkowski and Westover, 1999) indicate that intensive courses yield equivalent, and sometimes superior, learning outcomes when compared to matched traditional-length courses. Moreover, under some conditions, intensive courses can lead to a more rewarding learning experience for students than traditionally scheduled classes (Scott and Conrad, 1992;Scott, 1995Scott, , 1996.This chapter explores how students experience intensive courses differently than they do traditional scheduling formats and the factors that contribute to high-quality intensive course experiences. These insights emanate from a qualitative study (Scott, 1994) that compared two matched sets of college classes: an intensive and a semester-length English and marketing class. Each set of classes was taught by the same instructor and