2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.01.140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Decisional Capacity Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to experimental findings, this method's prediction accuracy can reach 94.41 percent, which is about 10.22 percent higher than that of conventional methods. e e system of reference [12] e system of reference [16] is paper system The system of reference [12] The system of reference [16] This paper system Test set e system of reference [12] e system of reference [16] is paper system Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience prediction model can utilise NN's self-learning, self-adaptation, and nonlinear approximation capabilities to calculate the quantitative evaluation while also quantifying the subjective factors in the current evaluation system based on expert ratings. Its calculation efficiency is higher than that of the current evaluation system.…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to experimental findings, this method's prediction accuracy can reach 94.41 percent, which is about 10.22 percent higher than that of conventional methods. e e system of reference [12] e system of reference [16] is paper system The system of reference [12] The system of reference [16] This paper system Test set e system of reference [12] e system of reference [16] is paper system Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience prediction model can utilise NN's self-learning, self-adaptation, and nonlinear approximation capabilities to calculate the quantitative evaluation while also quantifying the subjective factors in the current evaluation system based on expert ratings. Its calculation efficiency is higher than that of the current evaluation system.…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhandari et al used the adaptive and self-learning principles of BPNN (Back propagation neural network) for instructional quality evaluation, and proposed an NN-based instructional quality evaluation model structure and an improved BP network learning algorithm [ 10 ]. Donlan and Byrne pointed out that the introduction of evaluation methods in the teaching of piano group lessons will help teachers to fully understand the whole process of teaching, adjust teaching strategies in time, improve students' self-confidence, and stimulate their inner learning motivation; thus realizing piano learning as soon as possible autonomy and the formation of quality education [ 11 , 12 ]. Capella-Peris et al pointed out that the diversified instructional methods, interactive teaching process, and comprehensive teaching content of piano group lessons in normal normal schools are conducive to cultivating students' keyboard performance application, cooperation, performance, and creativity; Comprehensive quality of music [ 13 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) However, DL Stufflebeam, Warthin, and Sanders believe that teaching evaluation is "a process of systematically searching and collecting information to assist decision-makers in choosing one of the various feasible ways." is view has won the majority of people [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%