2007
DOI: 10.18546/herj.07.1.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Emotive and Controversial History to 3-7 Year Olds: A Report for The Historical Association

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All five centres visited museums regularly, and all of the teachers emphasized, in different ways, how important it was for children to sense history, and for it to be tangible and perceptible. This way of relating children’s immediate experiences to distant historical times could be a means of overcoming Piaget-inspired scepticism regarding the teaching of history in early childhood (Harnett, 2007).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All five centres visited museums regularly, and all of the teachers emphasized, in different ways, how important it was for children to sense history, and for it to be tangible and perceptible. This way of relating children’s immediate experiences to distant historical times could be a means of overcoming Piaget-inspired scepticism regarding the teaching of history in early childhood (Harnett, 2007).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He believed that children in this age group lacked the ability to place events in sequences and develop narratives, and that children could develop awareness of time only when it could be linked to places, people and objects (Brumlik, 2005). Due to Piagetian theories and child-centred notions that ‘learning should always begin with the child’, some teachers have been unwilling to teach children about the distant past because it is removed from children’s immediate experiences (Harnett, 2007). There is reason to fear that this may still be the view held by some practitioners in the field (Dixon and Hales, 2014), and there is evidence that some people believe that it is quite inappropriate for young children to learn about history (Cooper, 2007).…”
Section: Previous Research and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of all the chosen historical events, only a few can be classed as controversial. The fact that they are directed at 3 to 5-year-old children is doubtlessly one factor that determines this, but there are some exceptions which, precisely, highlight the need to face up from an early age some realities that may not have a "happy ending" (HARNETT, 2007). In recent decades in the French context, historical relevance has been given to subjects that are far removed from the 19 th -century romanticization of the national identity, with sensitive topics such as the Holocaust, the Armenian genocide and immigration brought into the classroom (FALAIZE, 2010).…”
Section: (J128)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although history belongs to the social sciences, which have a place in the early years' curriculum, research in this field remains scarce. History as a subject is considered appropriate for the early years [6] and early primary grades [7] as it offers opportunities for young children to explore and develop in the following dimensions: Although there is still a need for further research that will examine the development of historical thinking, historical understanding, and historical consciousness [8], researchers believe in young children's potential to acquire historical knowledge and develop foundational skills for the future [6,[8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%