2020
DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2020.1784097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching for innovation competence in higher education Built Environment engineering classrooms: teachers’ beliefs and perceptions of the learning environment

Abstract: In this study we investigated teachers' beliefs about innovation competence relevance and their creative self-efficacy and compared teachers' and students' perceptions of the learning environment in the Built Environment engineering education domain. In total, 94 teachers participated in this study by completing a questionnaire. Teachers perceived their creative self-efficacy and the learning environment in their classrooms to be supportive of innovation competence. However, only a minority of the teachers con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, research reports have shown that in general, teachers do little to foster innovation competence in students or do so in an implicit way (Beghetto & Kaufman, 2013;Ovbiagbonhia et al, 2019;Passig & Cohen, 2014;Root-Bernstein & Root-Bernstein, 2017). Ovbiagbonhia et al (2020) studied whether teachers in the domain of Built Environment engineering education considered teaching innovation competence to be relevant. The researchers found that only 15% of the teachers considered teaching for innovation competence relevant, while the majority had a more neutral or even negative opinion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, research reports have shown that in general, teachers do little to foster innovation competence in students or do so in an implicit way (Beghetto & Kaufman, 2013;Ovbiagbonhia et al, 2019;Passig & Cohen, 2014;Root-Bernstein & Root-Bernstein, 2017). Ovbiagbonhia et al (2020) studied whether teachers in the domain of Built Environment engineering education considered teaching innovation competence to be relevant. The researchers found that only 15% of the teachers considered teaching for innovation competence relevant, while the majority had a more neutral or even negative opinion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although education plays a central role in the development of innovation skills, several studies have indicated that institutions of higher education are not yet meeting this demand (Badcock et al, 2010;Kasule et al, 2015;Tynjälä, 1999;Vila et al, 2012;Virtanen & Tynjälä, 2016). These studies have shown that innovation competence is not yet addressed in actual teaching (Beghetto & Kaufman, 2014;Choo, 2018;Edwards-Schacter et al, 2015;Ovbiagbonhia et al, 2019Ovbiagbonhia et al, , 2020 or assessment (Keinänen & Kairisto-Mertanen, 2019;Kivunja, 2014;Marin-Garcia et al, 2016;Passig & Cohen, 2014;Root-Bernstein & Root-Bernstein, 2017). This may be because educators in general do not have sufficient knowledge, experience or access to design principles or instructional strategies to enable them to foster innovation competence in their classrooms (Beghetto & Kaufman, 2014;Ovbiagbonhia et al, 2019Ovbiagbonhia et al, , 2020Passig & Cohen, 2014;Root-Bernstein & Root-Bernstein, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations