2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-019-04075-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching–learning-based optimisation algorithm and its application in capturing critical slip surface in slope stability analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yamagami and Ueta [88] Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) 1.338 Yamagami and Ueta [88] Simplex method 1.339-1.348 Cheng et al [87] Particle swarm optimisation (PSO) 1.329 Cheng et al [87] Modified particle swarm optimisation (MPSO) 1.326 Cheng et al [20] Modified harmony search (MHS) 1.322 Jianping et al [89] Genetic algorithm (GA) + line 1.324 Jianping et al [89] Genetic algorithm (GA) + Spline 1.321 Kahatadeniya et al [21] Ant colony optimisation (ACO) 1.311-2.966 Khajehzadeh et al [25] Particle swarm optimisation (PSO) 1.321 Khajehzadeh et al [25] Modified particle swarm optimisation (MPSO) 1.308 Kang et al [27] Artificial bee colony optimisation (ABC) 1.321 Kashani et al [48] Imperialistic competitive algorithm (ICA) 1.321 Xiao et al [43] Enhanced fireworks algorithm (EFW) 1.322 RS slope [90] Cuckoo search 1.327 Mishra et al [50] Teaching-learning-based optimisation (TLBO) 1.324-1.325 ALO (This study) Antlion Optimiser (ALO) NP = 10 1.334-1.387 ALO (This study) Antlion Optimiser (ALO) NP = 50 1.317-1.349 Fig. 7 Factor of safety for fittest antlion versus number of iterations by using populations of 50 and 10 for example 1 Figure 8 presents the slip surface for populations of 10 and 100 identified using the current technique.…”
Section: Source Methods Fsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yamagami and Ueta [88] Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) 1.338 Yamagami and Ueta [88] Simplex method 1.339-1.348 Cheng et al [87] Particle swarm optimisation (PSO) 1.329 Cheng et al [87] Modified particle swarm optimisation (MPSO) 1.326 Cheng et al [20] Modified harmony search (MHS) 1.322 Jianping et al [89] Genetic algorithm (GA) + line 1.324 Jianping et al [89] Genetic algorithm (GA) + Spline 1.321 Kahatadeniya et al [21] Ant colony optimisation (ACO) 1.311-2.966 Khajehzadeh et al [25] Particle swarm optimisation (PSO) 1.321 Khajehzadeh et al [25] Modified particle swarm optimisation (MPSO) 1.308 Kang et al [27] Artificial bee colony optimisation (ABC) 1.321 Kashani et al [48] Imperialistic competitive algorithm (ICA) 1.321 Xiao et al [43] Enhanced fireworks algorithm (EFW) 1.322 RS slope [90] Cuckoo search 1.327 Mishra et al [50] Teaching-learning-based optimisation (TLBO) 1.324-1.325 ALO (This study) Antlion Optimiser (ALO) NP = 10 1.334-1.387 ALO (This study) Antlion Optimiser (ALO) NP = 50 1.317-1.349 Fig. 7 Factor of safety for fittest antlion versus number of iterations by using populations of 50 and 10 for example 1 Figure 8 presents the slip surface for populations of 10 and 100 identified using the current technique.…”
Section: Source Methods Fsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithmic specific parameters for each algorithm with their numerical values used in slope stability analysis by different researchers ACO [21] Ant colony size (300), total number of tours (200), pheromone evaporation rate ( = 0.3 ), bilinear scaling constant Z = 2 for the quality function PSO [24] Inertial weight = 0.5 , swarm size (60), cognitive parameter c 1 =2 and social parameter c 2 = 2 , number of iterations (200) SA [26] Initial temperature state, cooling rate, acceptance probability, maximum number of iterations ABC [27] Bee colony size (20-50), number of cycles (100), limit (300-650) FA [28] Swarm of n = 50 particles, parameter representing attractiveness, light absorption coefficient ( ) varying between 0.1 and 10, generation = 3000; FSO [29] Fish pool f p = 0.9 , number of fishes in f p , parameter for optimisation pr = 0.1 , probability array = 0.8, maximum number of iterations = 700 GSA [30,31] Population size N = 50 , initial gravitational constant G 0 = 100 , constant = 0.1 , maximum iteration t max = 1000 BBO [32] Number of habitats (100), mutation rate M max = 0.2 , maximum immigration and emigration rate I = 0.5 and E = 1 , number of generations (250) BB-BC [33] Universe composed of N b = 30 number of bodies, search space reduction parameter =0.7-0.9, maximum size of the step = 1 , scaling factor = 0.7 , generation number =50, distribution constants = 1.4, = 0.3 GA [37] Crossover (0.75) and mutation probability (0.002), position of crossover, length of chromosome (24), population size (200), number of generations (300) FWA [43] Number of spark seeds N = 10 , number of generating sparks M = 40 , maximum explosion amplitude  = 40 , number of Gaussian sparks M e = 5 , total number of iterations (2000) BHA [44] Population of stars (50), maximum number of iterations (500) DE [46] Weighting factor F, crossover constant C r , size of population (50), maximum number of generations (3000) ES [46] Size of population (50), maximum number of generations (3000), number of offspring , standard deviation ICA [48] Population of countries (300), population of imperialists (8) and decades (500), rate of revolution (0.3), damp ratio (0.99), uniting threshold (0.02), control parameter = 0.1, = 2, = 0.02 HS [52] Harmony memory consideration rate HR = 0.98 , the pitch adjustment rate PR = 0.1 , harmony memory HM of size M, number of function evaluations NOFs TLBO [50] Number of learners and maximum number of iterations ALO (proposed approach)…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Energy-efficient routing protocols like topology-based WBAN [26], multi-hop based WBAN [27], medium access control based WBAN [28,29], and priority-based WBAN [30] are proposed by the authors. In order to reduce the consumption of energy in an efficient manner, various optimization algorithms [31][32][33][34][35][36] have been explored in the area of wireless technology [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. However, such algorithms don't focus much on WBAN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several linear-nonlinear, local-global, and stochastic-deterministic techniques have been used to obtain the solution of the objective function [16]. Traditional deterministic approaches cannot correctly identify damages because they get trapped in multiple local minima and are timeconsuming [17]. Almost all conventional optimisation methods do not guarantee the global minima and are highly sensitive to the initial conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%