2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21350-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Logic in Philosophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… I do not mean to deny, of course, that introductory logic courses come with their own set of specific pedagogical challenges. Some students have a difficult time adapting to the use of mathematical symbolism to represent and analyze natural language arguments, and it has been argued that it might be more efficient to postpone the introduction of mathematical symbolism longer than is usually done (Griffith ; Faust ; Carrascal ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… I do not mean to deny, of course, that introductory logic courses come with their own set of specific pedagogical challenges. Some students have a difficult time adapting to the use of mathematical symbolism to represent and analyze natural language arguments, and it has been argued that it might be more efficient to postpone the introduction of mathematical symbolism longer than is usually done (Griffith ; Faust ; Carrascal ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%