2014
DOI: 10.19030/ajbe.v7i3.8629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching MBA Students Teamwork And Team Leadership Skills: An Empirical Evaluation Of A Classroom Educational Program

Abstract: A comprehensive educational program for teaching behavioral teamwork and team leadership skills was rigorously evaluated with 148 MBA students enrolled at an urban regional campus of a Midwestern public university. Major program components included (1) videotaped student teams in leaderless group discussion (LGD) exercises at the course beginning and end, (2) behavioral assessment of student teamwork and team leadership in the LGDs, (3) peer and instructor performance feedback and coaching after each LGD, (4) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the late 1980s a considerable amount of literature has been published on the importance of group work in the higher education system. Scholars have given prominence to a host of skills that group work offers students (Colbeck et al, 2000;Livingstone and Lynch, 2000;Michaelsen, 1992;Cumming, 2010;Hobson et al, 2014, Cumming et al, 2015 and the problems that students face while working in groups (Pauli et al, 2008;Walker, 2001;Freeman and Greencare, 2011;Maiden and Perry, 2011). Group work research has continued to become more elaborate with studies delving into group work design such as group forming mechanisms (Webb et al, 2002), devising disjunctive or conjunctive tasks (Curşeu et al, 2011), and providing a fairer method of assessment that often includes a peer review element (Pfaff and Huddleston, 2003;Erez et al, 2002;Oakely et al, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the late 1980s a considerable amount of literature has been published on the importance of group work in the higher education system. Scholars have given prominence to a host of skills that group work offers students (Colbeck et al, 2000;Livingstone and Lynch, 2000;Michaelsen, 1992;Cumming, 2010;Hobson et al, 2014, Cumming et al, 2015 and the problems that students face while working in groups (Pauli et al, 2008;Walker, 2001;Freeman and Greencare, 2011;Maiden and Perry, 2011). Group work research has continued to become more elaborate with studies delving into group work design such as group forming mechanisms (Webb et al, 2002), devising disjunctive or conjunctive tasks (Curşeu et al, 2011), and providing a fairer method of assessment that often includes a peer review element (Pfaff and Huddleston, 2003;Erez et al, 2002;Oakely et al, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge is "how?" Hobson, Strupeck, Griffin, Szostek, and Rominger (2014) propose leaderless group discussion (LGD) exercises at the start and end of the semester. This effort provides an empirical tool for measuring the nature and degree of team dynamics and leadership.…”
Section: Leadership Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the near-universal use of teams in U.S. businesses (Cannon-Bowers & Bowers, 2011), more so since the shutdown of industries during the second quarter of 2020 due to the COVID pandemic, it is necessary for graduating students, more than ever, to have the ability to work as an integrated unit with others-teamwork. Not surprisingly, organizations consistently encourage colleges and universities to prepare curricula to build student teamwork and leadership skills (Hobson, et al 2014). Educators have responded by increasingly employing team assignmentsdescribed in the literature as problem-based learning (PBL) exercises-in various courses (Hughes & Jones, 2011;Rafferty, 2013).…”
Section: Teamwork and Interpersonal Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, at the extreme end, Jessop (2018) describes how academic capitalism can result in efforts to seek advantage that rely on political or other forms of extra-economic coercion, such as false prospectuses. Earlier, we detailed some examples of how feedback or instructional teaching practices were being described as coaching, despite bearing little resemblance to how coaching has been conceptualized in the literature (Clegg et al, 2000; Faculty-Student Coaching 28 Hobson et al, 2014;Satzler & Sheu, 2002). Academic capitalism can explain this practice when we understand that coaching is often positioned as an executive 'perk' to reward top performers in the corporate world (McCauley & Hezlett, 2002).…”
Section: Coaching and Academic Capitalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sue- Chan & Latham, 2004), peers (i.e. Hobson et al, 2014;Oreopoulos & Petronijevic, 2018), alumni and post graduate students (i.e. Capstick et al, 2018;Hunt & Weintraub, 2004;Losch et al, 2006;Sargent et al, 2009;Shojai et al, 2007).…”
Section: Call For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%