2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2016.7757533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching mobile application development through lectures, interactive tutorials, and Pair Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar case was found in Seyam et al [79] who evaluated whether pair programming (an agile software development practice, used in both industry and education, which enforces a role‐based approach to learning new programming concepts) would help 53 students during five sessions in a mobile development course to better understand mobile programming. For the evaluation of the experience, observations and questionnaires were used to show a rich experience where programming for mobile devices goes beyond merely writing code.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar case was found in Seyam et al [79] who evaluated whether pair programming (an agile software development practice, used in both industry and education, which enforces a role‐based approach to learning new programming concepts) would help 53 students during five sessions in a mobile development course to better understand mobile programming. For the evaluation of the experience, observations and questionnaires were used to show a rich experience where programming for mobile devices goes beyond merely writing code.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This study aimed to catalogue and synthesise ‘innovative’ teaching and learning approaches within CS by aligning it to the relatively new concept of Education 4.0 [7, 79]. Building on a small‐scale initial study conducted among European CS educators [71], this review used a three‐step coding process to review and synthesise 66 CS studies from across the globe in the period 2016–2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%