“…The best that can be claimed, perhaps, is that the Universities Council for the Education of Teachers at least acknowledged and mapped out the profound implications of the ECM agenda in terms of teachers' professional knowledge. Kirk and Broadfoot (2006), for example, outlined six implications for ITE: Inspired by Teach for America, but adapted to local circumstances (Ellis et al 2016), Teach First sought to overcome the 'scourge' (Wigdortz, 2012) of educational underachievement among the poor by recruiting well-qualified graduates, prepared to commit to teaching for at least two years in a London secondary school in 'challenging circumstances'as defined with reference either to the school's public examination results at 16+ or to the proportion of pupils eligible for Free School Meals. Occupational socialization has been shown to be the strongest factor counteracting attempts at educating innovative teachers, even in tightly-integrated partnership ITE programmes (Wideen, Mayer-Smith and Moon 1998;Brouwer and Korthagen 2005) designed to facilitate the use of research to interrogate existing practices.…”