2006
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2005.062950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Public Health Through a Pedagogy of Collegiality

Abstract: Curriculum development in masters of public health programs that effectively meets the complex challenges of the 21st century is an important part of public health education and requires purposeful thinking. Current approaches to training the public health work-force do not adequately prepare professionals to be culturally competent in addressing health disparities. Principles of community-based participatory research highlight the importance of building relationships of mutual accountability and emphasize col… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that students within this subject had already worked in small interprofessional groups for a major assessment and had been in the same tutorial for 10 weeks before this learning activity, the group discussions may have been more fruitful than if the activity had been introduced earlier in the semester, as some rapport had been fostered. Thus in planning team-based interprofessional reflective activities the size, consistency and duration of the group as well as the underlying pedagogical philosophies are worthy considerations (Chávez, Turalba, & Malik, 2006). A failure to take these aspects into consideration may cause students to disengage from reflective practice, limiting their ability to develop an integral skill for CC and interprofessional worka conclusion which also reflects findings from a recent realist synthesis of the literature on teamwork in interprofessional practice (Sims, Hewitt, & Harris, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Considering that students within this subject had already worked in small interprofessional groups for a major assessment and had been in the same tutorial for 10 weeks before this learning activity, the group discussions may have been more fruitful than if the activity had been introduced earlier in the semester, as some rapport had been fostered. Thus in planning team-based interprofessional reflective activities the size, consistency and duration of the group as well as the underlying pedagogical philosophies are worthy considerations (Chávez, Turalba, & Malik, 2006). A failure to take these aspects into consideration may cause students to disengage from reflective practice, limiting their ability to develop an integral skill for CC and interprofessional worka conclusion which also reflects findings from a recent realist synthesis of the literature on teamwork in interprofessional practice (Sims, Hewitt, & Harris, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Within the limitations of the course, we wanted to foster dynamics similar to those professional experiences in forming interdisciplinary health teams, as articulated by scholars such as Nandiwada and Christine (2010); Korasim-Korosy et al (2014); Perrault et al (2008);and, Tourse et al (2005). Our intent was to "teach through a pedagogy of collegiality" by integrating the principles of community organizing, building community and valuing diversity, engaging the senses, and writing across the curriculum" (Chavez, Ruby-Asuncion, & Malik, 2006, p.1175). These observations are further supported by a focus group conducted by Barclay & Rodgers (2006).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their teaching strategies involve recognising and taking into account the broader societal context; its impact on local problems and social change are articulated. Consistent with Chávez, Turalba and Malik [56], PHNEs reported that the significant tenet of their pedagogical approaches was to create a balanced environment for learning public health by facilitating critical dialogue about social conditions, giving students a voice, and motivating them to reflect on their lives and take action.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 74%