2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Radiology to Medical Students—There Is a Need for Change to Better Prepare Students for Clinical Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preclinical students are still in learning knowledge phase and they have not yet acquired the appropriate competences to understand the role of these specialties and the dynamics they are based on (Oancea 2007;Moloney 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preclinical students are still in learning knowledge phase and they have not yet acquired the appropriate competences to understand the role of these specialties and the dynamics they are based on (Oancea 2007;Moloney 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Despite strong advocacy on the part of the radiology community for a compulsory medical school curriculum in radiation safety and appropriate imaging use through initiatives including the Alliance of Medical Student Education in Radiology, Liaison Committee on Medical Education, the Association of American Medical Colleges, and the American Medical Association, important contextual principles of the practice of medicine, including imaging appropriateness, radiation safety, imaging modality differences, and provider-patient risk/benefit communication, are taught rarely. 5,23,34,35,41 Import antly, such lack of exposure to the challenges of appropriate imaging and the presence and effects of radiation in diagnostic imaging leaves students feeling unprepared and unsure about their future radiology ordering practices. 29,34,42 Our study demonstrates feasibility and a statistically significant impact of a single, brief interactive session on increased awareness and knowledge of the utility, limitations, and risks associated with medical imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,23,34,35,41 Import antly, such lack of exposure to the challenges of appropriate imaging and the presence and effects of radiation in diagnostic imaging leaves students feeling unprepared and unsure about their future radiology ordering practices. 29,34,42 Our study demonstrates feasibility and a statistically significant impact of a single, brief interactive session on increased awareness and knowledge of the utility, limitations, and risks associated with medical imaging. One recurring theme from our study is the shift in attitude on the part of young students toward the importance of checking the patient's radiation dose history and discussing risks and benefits of the examination with the patient/caregiver so they can make an informed decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 31 , 32 Similarly, using an electronic survey on undergraduate teaching distributed by the European Society of Radiology (ESR) to 38 national delegates of the ESR Education Committee, Kourdioukova et al 33 revealed a large number of differences in curriculum content and teaching methods throughout Europe. Furthermore, Moloney et al 34 reported a minimal improvement in the knowledge of medical students in requesting radiological investigations over the course of the final medical year in the USA, and this was attributed to a relatively short period of learning in the clinical setting. Moloney and colleagues further suggested that emphasis on education and appropriateness may offer an improvement in the utilisation of radiology services and improve patient care.…”
Section: Global State Of Undergraduate Nuclear Medicine Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%