2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0401-3_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Verbal Behavior to Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significantly more children in the IBT group than in the other two groups had IQ, language, and adaptive behavior test scores that increased by at least one standard deviation from intake to final assessment. (p. 3326) The fact that intensive behavior-analytic interventions produce significant gains in language is consistent with other research showing the effectiveness of the application of a behavioranalytic theory to teaching language -based largely on Skinner's (1957) analysis of verbal behavior -to children with language deficits (see Carr & Miguel, 2013;LaFrance & Miguel, 2014).…”
Section: Applying Behavior-analytic Theorysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Significantly more children in the IBT group than in the other two groups had IQ, language, and adaptive behavior test scores that increased by at least one standard deviation from intake to final assessment. (p. 3326) The fact that intensive behavior-analytic interventions produce significant gains in language is consistent with other research showing the effectiveness of the application of a behavioranalytic theory to teaching language -based largely on Skinner's (1957) analysis of verbal behavior -to children with language deficits (see Carr & Miguel, 2013;LaFrance & Miguel, 2014).…”
Section: Applying Behavior-analytic Theorysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As hierarchical naming seems to be required for the emergence of Visual Categorization and possibly other skills, it may be important to assess whether normed language tools can predict the presence of this type of naming, and whether certain scores can predict the use of listener or speaker training to generate derived categorization. If test scores show the absence of naming, then clinicians should make efforts to directly assess (Delfs & Frampton, 2014), and if needed, establish a generalized naming repertoire prior to teaching categorization (Greer & Ross, 2008;LaFrance & Miguel, 2014). Although additional replications are necessary, the current study describes a practical way in which clinicians may teach novel categorization to children with autism (see Miguel & Petursdottir, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Future studies should investigate whether intraverbal naming is necessary or sufficient to establish and maintain responding during equivalence (symmetry and transitivity) tests. This information will not only serve to refine our experimental model of meaning and symbolic behavior (Sidman 1994) but also to generate verbal behavior technologies to teach equivalence-type responding to individuals with developmental disabilities (LaFrance and Miguel 2014;Miguel and Petursdottir 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%