2009
DOI: 10.1037/a0016593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching White privilege to White students can mean saying good-bye to positive student evaluations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I direct students toward the abundant highquality materials to help teachers create safer schools for LGBTQIQ students, many of which are online and free (e.g., GLSEN, GSA Network, The Safe Space Network). Finally, I continue embodying queerness with increased confidence each semester, in large part to model the practice of bringing one's whole self into the classroom (Boatright-Horowitz & Soeung, 2009;Rofes, 2005).…”
Section: Jillian's Story: Teaching and Embodying Queernessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…I direct students toward the abundant highquality materials to help teachers create safer schools for LGBTQIQ students, many of which are online and free (e.g., GLSEN, GSA Network, The Safe Space Network). Finally, I continue embodying queerness with increased confidence each semester, in large part to model the practice of bringing one's whole self into the classroom (Boatright-Horowitz & Soeung, 2009;Rofes, 2005).…”
Section: Jillian's Story: Teaching and Embodying Queernessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, with the topic of race/racism, some white students challenged my qualification to discuss the topic alleging that I do not know what really happened in the US history. Students' both explicit and implicit resistance in diversity courses, especially white students resistance against the notion of privilege, has been found in many prior studies (Boatright-Horowitz & Soeung, 2009;Dunn et al, 2014;Han et al, 2014;Ukpokodu, 2007), and thus it was not surprising for me to experience this. In one extreme case, however, a student fought back in front of the entire class and then eventually dropped out of the program.…”
Section: Modeling Responsiveness: a Double-edged Swordmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Despite students' evaluation of teaching quality being important, it was determined that this was not a priority in this evaluation process as official teaching evaluations took place later in the semester. Furthermore, Boatright‐Horowitz and Soeung () raised concerns regarding the legitimacy of teaching evaluations when the syllabus centres on issues of racism and White privilege. Namely, it is asserted that “students often reject both message and messenger, projecting their frustrations and emotions about this topic onto instructors,” thus resulting in bias and negative teaching evaluations (Boatright‐Horowitz & Soeung, , p. 575).…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%