2022
DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v53.1409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Team-based rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a qualitative synthesis of evidence of experiences of the rehabilitation process

Abstract: Objective: To synthesize and explore experiences of the rehabilitation process for adults with traumatic brain injury receiving team-based rehabilitation. Data sources: A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted according to the "Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research" (ENTREQ) Guidelines, of qualitative studies published in 5 databases in 2000–21. Study selection and data extraction: Screening, selection of relevant studies, assessment of methodological limit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different forms of team work, including interdisciplinary (IDR), multidisciplinary (MDR), and transdisciplinary rehabilitation formats, were described. However, there are disputes about the suitability, effectiveness, and setting of each type of team ( 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ). The composition of the rehabilitation teams and the number of team members vary widely depending on the disease condition and the individualized choice of the primary team member.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different forms of team work, including interdisciplinary (IDR), multidisciplinary (MDR), and transdisciplinary rehabilitation formats, were described. However, there are disputes about the suitability, effectiveness, and setting of each type of team ( 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ). The composition of the rehabilitation teams and the number of team members vary widely depending on the disease condition and the individualized choice of the primary team member.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%