Team Displays Work, Particularly with Communication Breakdown: Performance and Situation Awareness in a Simulated Forest Fire

Parush, Avi; Ma, Chunyun

doi:10.1037/e572172013-080

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These tips are based on the experience of designing two healthcare team situation displays, one for the cardiac OR team (Parush, et al, 2011), and the other for the ED/Resuscitation bay team. The tips are also based on knowledge transferred from designing a situation display for forest fire incident management (Parush & Ma, 2012;Hueston et al, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Twelve Tips to Designing a Situation Display for the Healthcare Team

Parush

Momtahan

Kramer

et al. 2015

Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of the team display is to present a current and dynamic situation picture to the healthcare team. The challenges in designing such a display are determining the relevant situational information and presenting it in a way that is timely, unobtrusive, and not overloading. The tips here focus on designing situation displays for healthcare teams during a clinical procedure (such as a surgery or a procedure in the emergency unit). These tips are based on the experience of designing two healthcare team situation displays, one for the cardiac OR team and the other for the ED/Resuscitation bay team, as well knowledge transferred from forest fire incident management.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Twelve Tips to Designing a Situation Display for the Healthcare Team

Parush

Momtahan

Kramer

et al. 2015

Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Brooks observed that the interdependent flow of information and control "cannot be easily disentangled" nor planned ahead precisely (Bodeau et al, 2010). Although information need and control flow between external agencies has been recognised as being complex, involving subgroups and dynamic cliques (Comfort and Haase, 2006), we consider all of these parties as Management of complex situations such as natural disasters, flooding, forest fires, earth quakes and mass-casualty accidents often leads to communication breakdown and information loss (Parush and Ma, 2012). Good situational awareness is vital for decision making and quick response (Yang et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reasoning About Interactive Systems in Dynamic Situations of Use

Bowen

Hinze

2017

Human–Computer Interaction Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interactive software, systems and devices are typically designed for a specific (set of) purpose(s) and the design process used ensures that they will perform satisfactorily when used as specified. In many cases users will use these systems in unintended and unexpected ways where it seems appropriate, which can lead to problems as the differing usage situations have unintended effects on use. We have previously introduced a method of combining formal models of interactive systems with models of usage scenarios to allow reasoning about the effects that this unintended use may have. We now extend this approach to consider how such models might be used when considering deliberately extending the usage scenarios of existing interactive systems to support other activities, for example in emergency situations. This chapter explores a methodology to identify the effect of properties of emergency scenarios on the interactivity of interactive systems and devices. This then enables us to consider when, and how, we might utilise such devices in such emergencies.

show abstract

“…While there appears to be a positive relationship between TSA and team performance, there is no guarantee of it (Rafferty et al, 2010). As noted by Parush and Ma (2012) who found that while the presence of a team display facilitated both team performance and TSA, particularly during communication breakdown, no direct relationship was found between the two. They hypothesized that while team performance is associated with TSA, their relationship may be indirect as other factors may be at work.…”

Section: Team Situational Awareness and Team Performancementioning

confidence: 96%

Examining the Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity, Team Situational Awareness and Team Performance in Extreme Work Teams

Morawiec¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Extreme work teams such as the ones found in the military, police, and firefighter domains rely heavily on team situational awareness (TSA). In these domains, a lack of TSA has been associated with the loss of life. While there are several factors which may contribute to TSA and team performance (e.g. communication), selecting the right individuals with the right cognitive abilities may also play an important role. This study, therefore, examined the relationship between a team's mean working memory capacity (WMC), TSA, and team performance. Results showed that while within-team WMC differences were not associated with TSA or team performance, teams with a higher mean WMC did have a positive relationship with TSA, team specific queries, and had higher overlapping correct SA. A positive relationship was also found between TSA and two separate forms of team way-finding performance.

show abstract

Team Displays Work, Particularly with Communication Breakdown: Performance and Situation Awareness in a Simulated Forest Fire

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Twelve Tips to Designing a Situation Display for the Healthcare Team

Twelve Tips to Designing a Situation Display for the Healthcare Team

Reasoning About Interactive Systems in Dynamic Situations of Use

Examining the Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity, Team Situational Awareness and Team Performance in Extreme Work Teams

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About