This research investigates the impact of intercompetitor licensing between an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and an independent remanufacturer (IR) on (1) market competition between new and remanufactured products, (2) the IR's remanufacturing strategy, and (3) the IR's optimal quality choice for remanufactured products. In the considered supply chain, the OEM sells new products, and the IR collects used products and then sells remanufactured products to compete with the OEM. To produce remanufactured products, the IR can acquire remanufacturing technology either by paying a licensing fee to the OEM or self-developing it in-house by incurring a fixed research and development cost. We develop game-theoretic models to determine the optimal supply chain decisions concerning the royalty licensing fee, IR's remanufacturing strategy and production quality, and product sale prices.We find that a licensing contract will always induce the OEM and the IR to increase their sales price for new and remanufactured products. However, the OEM will always increase the sales price for new products to a larger degree than that of the IR. This can alleviate price competition between new and remanufactured products and make remanufactured products more competitive in the market. Under licensing cooperation, the IR will always remanufacture used products to a higher quality level which will intensify quality competition. No matter whether the royalty fee is exogenously or endogenously determined by the OEM, there exists a wide range of parameter regions such that a licensing contract will produce a win-win solution for the OEM and the IR. A licensing cooperation may be reached even when the unit royalty fee is at a relatively low level and the total royalty fee is higher than the selfdevelopment option.Managerial relevance statement: From a practical perspective, this study proposes how the OEM, and the IR should make licensing cooperation decision which aims to achieve a win-win solution. It also reveals that a royalty licensing contract can be mutually acceptable between the OEM and the IR in a wide range of parameter regions. This result is important for managers who want to engage in the 2 remanufacturing business. For the OEM, the result shows that licensing its remanufacturing technology at a low royalty fee may still be beneficial. For the IR, the result shows that seeking technology licensing may be more profitable even when the total paid royalty fee is higher than the cost of self-developing the technology. Strategic implications of royalty licensing on market competition, remanufacturing production strategy, and remanufacturing quality strategy should be carefully considered before making strategic decisions on remanufacturing and licensing cooperation.