Team status conflict

Pai, Jieun; Bendersky, Corinne

doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.001

Cited by 21 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…So why does EI help prevent status conflict? Similar to relational conflict, shifting focus to the task at hand can help alleviate status conflict, and recognizing our own emotional reactions and those of others may allow us to divert the discussion to the task at hand [38]. However, as noted earlier, EI can also be used in destructive ways, and status conflict may be the primary area of negative use.…”

Section: Ei and Process And Status Conflictmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Whereas task and process conflict focus on issues related to the group task at hand, status conflict focuses on the social hierarchy of the group and how much status members have and/or desire [37]. Status conflicts can emerge from irrelevant arguments as members compete for more influence in the group [38]. As a result, status conflict tends to be long-lasting, affects the entire structure of the group, and can lead to more competitive behaviors in groups given the benefits of higher status [36].…”

Section: Intragroup Conflict Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a result, status conflict tends to be long-lasting, affects the entire structure of the group, and can lead to more competitive behaviors in groups given the benefits of higher status [36]. Furthermore, status conflicts are often a distraction to the group, as members shift attention to individuals rather than the assigned task at hand [38]. Status conflicts likely play a role in family farms, especially for women [39] and in-laws [40], who are often excluded from conversations.…”

Section: Intragroup Conflict Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, being aware of your own emotions, and the ability to manage your own and others' emotions, can help reduce status conflicts among family farm members. Status conflict is similar to relational conflict in that it distracts people from the task at hand and suggests the prioritization of individual goals over the group goal [38]. Furthermore, status conflict often emerges from competition for resources [38], and most family farm members indicate that competition occurs when decisions are made on the farm [8,9].…”

Section: Ei and Process And Status Conflictmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Exploring the Impact of Emotional Intelligence on Family Farm Member Conflict Experiences

Paskewitz¹

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Family farm sustainability traditionally focuses on economic and environmental issues. However, sustaining family farms also relies on understanding how to sustain the relationships contained therein. Emotional intelligence (EI) is an important means through which family farm members can sustain relationships, especially when handing conflict between members. This paper focused on how four EI dimensions (awareness of own emotion, management of own emotion, awareness of others’ emotions, management of others’ emotions) could prevent four types of conflict within family farms (task, relational, process, and status). Family farm participants (N = 204) were recruited through social media posts and emails to specialty agricultural groups and agencies, and students at a university. Hierarchical regression results showed that awareness of own emotions, management of own emotions, and management of others’ emotions negatively predicted task, relational, process, and status conflict. Awareness of others’ emotions did not predict any conflict types. Theoretically, this article points to the importance of considering all four EI dimensions, since they impact conflict types differently. For the family farm members, being aware of their own emotions and being able to manage emotional responses in themselves and others can help prevent conflict from occurring, thereby sustaining both family and business relationships for the future.

show abstract

Section: Ei and Process And Status Conflictmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Intragroup Conflict Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Intragroup Conflict Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Ei and Process And Status Conflictmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Exploring the Impact of Emotional Intelligence on Family Farm Member Conflict Experiences

Paskewitz¹

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, at each of the described stages, it is necessary to monitor the personality and peculiarities of a person's behaviour in a conflict, borrowing the methodology of the personality-oriented approach (Pai, Bendersky, 2019).…”

Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Methods of Conflict Study in the System of Education

Rostovtseva

Машанов

2020

Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities &Amp; Social Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article raises the problem of developing methods for studying conflicts in the education system. The definition of conflict is given as a process that actualises violations by the subjects of interaction of established norms, rules, laws, requirements of a particular social environment. It is emphasised that today there are two main methodological approaches to the study of conflicts: activity-oriented and personalityoriented. The activity-oriented paradigm considers conflicts from the point of view of activity and development of the subjects of interaction and social environment. The personality-oriented approach focuses on the importance of personal characteristics of the interacting parties to resolve a conflict situation. The authors propose a comprehensive approach based on the symbiosis of personality-oriented and activity-oriented paradigms, which allows to take into account the main personal factors of subjects in the process of deployment and resolution of conflicts at each stage of a conflict situation: characterological peculiarities, self-esteem and intelligence, as well as behaviour strategies. An empirical pilot study was conducted among students of Siberian Federal University in order to determine leading personality features of an individual, which occupy the central place in a conflict, regardless of its stage and determine their relationship with the level of proneness to conflicts of a person. The data obtained allowed us to come to preliminary conclusions that a low level of proneness to conflicts is associated with such qualities as high intelligence, ability to think outside the box, emotional stability, self-confidence and awareness of one’s own capabilities. A high level of proneness to conflicts is due to the student’s inability or unwillingness to understand and accept the individuality of other people, inability to forgive others for their mistakes, low intelligence, emotional instability and anxiety. The revealed relationships confirmed the effectiveness of using an integrated approach to the study of conflicts, as well as the theoretical assumption of the mutual influence of individual psychological characteristics and the level of proneness to conflicts of a person. The results of the study will allow us to investigate the mechanisms of conflict behaviour of learners, taking into account their individual psychological characteristics at each stage of the development of a conflict situation, and therefore manage conflicts in the education system

show abstract