1980
DOI: 10.2307/376038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teamwork and Feedback: Broadening the Base of Collaborative Writing

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. National Council of Teachers of English is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to College English.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps most importantly, peer review allows for a student's writing to be read by readers other than the instructor. Thus researchers in writing, particularly in composition, have repeatedly found peer review helps student writers write with a heightened awareness of flesh and blood readers (e.g., Bissland (1980); Clifford (1981); Davis (1981); Ede and Lunsford (1985); Gebhardt ( 1980); Gere (1985) and( 1987); Morgan, et al (1987); O'Donnell, et al (1985); but see, Smit (1989), for a critique of the benefits of peer review).…”
Section: Peer Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Perhaps most importantly, peer review allows for a student's writing to be read by readers other than the instructor. Thus researchers in writing, particularly in composition, have repeatedly found peer review helps student writers write with a heightened awareness of flesh and blood readers (e.g., Bissland (1980); Clifford (1981); Davis (1981); Ede and Lunsford (1985); Gebhardt ( 1980); Gere (1985) and( 1987); Morgan, et al (1987); O'Donnell, et al (1985); but see, Smit (1989), for a critique of the benefits of peer review).…”
Section: Peer Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These processes dents as an instructional tool in the teaching of writing have been identified by Flower and Hayes (1980) as two has been the subject of increased attention in the of the principal components of writing. It is likely that literature (Bissland, 1980;Bruffee, 1984;Clifford, interacting dyads engage in either or both of these ac-1981 ; Gebhardt, 1980;George, 1984;Jacko, 1978;Lamtivities. A preliminary study (O'Donnell, Dansereau, berg, 1980;Pomerenke, 1984).…”
Section: Effects Of Cooperation and Editing Onmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The components are handwriting, spelling, punctuations, well sentence construction, and composing paragraph and text. Teachers of writing must have realized that students should have mastered all the components in order to get involved in the process of writing Writing process comprises of pre writing activities, composing and editing (Gebhard, 1980). In teaching writing, the teachers should introduce those three activities before asking their students to write.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%